The eBay Shopping.com Affair aka "The eBay Leap Day Auction Count Affair" aka "The eBay SDC_PROD Affair"
By Event Horizon Ides of March Edition, 15 March 2008 Revision: 2 April 2008 00:01 HST
"It's always difficult to keep personal prejudice out of a thing like this. And wherever you run into it, prejudice always obscures the truth. I don't really know what the truth is. I don't suppose anybody will ever really know." Juror #8, Twelve Angry Men (1957)
The Leap Day weekend brought with it an extra day of buy and selling on eBay. It also ushered in an interesting event. A number of listings from Shopping.com, an eBay company, ended up on eBay.com. Counted in the hundreds of thousands these product listings were viewable on eBay.com, but not buyable.
This was an event that had ample room for opinions. Aside from the fact that the average eBay buyer could not buy these products, there was the question of did these listings affect the auction counts? An important question as eBay provides those listing counts in their many reports to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Opinions ranged from an eBay Forum poster describing the event as "Ebay is padding their listings", to Randy Smythe ofMy Blog Utopia!stating "this padding of listings is a non-starter."
All this would definitely pique the curiosity of anyone interested in eBay. For about 5 seconds. Because all the relevant data is spread across Google, or deleted, archived, horded, and just plain not in one place for quick perusal. End 5 seconds.
We're going to attempt to put a smidgen of all that happened in this article. And over time expand the article slightly to accommodate new found pieces.
Before we begin, changing the subject slightly, you're wondering why the style of the title sounds oddly familiar? We were inspired by eBay, with their one mini-smidgen contribution.
"Agent Sent Message", ebay Customer Service, 1 March 2008
Prologue. Internet transations are perishable and human memories short.
"people simply remember a version of events which makes as much sense as they require it to make" Douglas Adams, Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency (1987)
This article should not be considered a complete rendering of the Leap Day (2/29/2008) weekend events or a tome with all the available data. It is meant to give a relatively quick overview of the situation, and provide leads for those who wish to pursue more in depth study.
I. How many listings were involved?
"It was an accident" Captain James Kirk "You seem to have a lot of them." Captain John Christopher Star Trek, Tomorrow Is Yesterday (26 January 1967)
Do Listing Counts Matter?
Let's start with the simple matter of, does it matter at all? The answer is, Yes.
Listing counts are important to eBay, as the figures are reported to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
In the "Unaudited eBay Marketplaces Supplemental Operating Data" section is "Number of New Listings (2)" with the definition "(2) Listings on eBay Marketplaces trading platforms during the quarter, regardless of whether the listing subsequently closed successfully."
Listing counts are important to eBay, as they are mentioned in the report to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Reference the "29-Feb-2008" "Form 10-K for EBAY INC" "Annual Report".
In the "Key Operating Metrics and Financial Information" section (emphasis ours) eBay states , "Members of our senior management team regularly review key operating metrics such as active users, listings".
Further, "These financial measures allow us to monitor the profitability of our business and to evaluate the effectiveness of investments that we have made (and continue to make) in the areas of marketing, product development, international expansion, customer support and site operations. We believe that an understanding of these key operating and financial measures and how they change over time is important to investors, analysts and other parties analyzing our business results and future market opportunities."
In the "Financial Summary" section (emphasis ours) eBay states, "we face challenges in the U.S., U.K. and Germany, which are our three largest markets, as growth of listings, active users and GMV on the eBay.com platform in those countries has slowed."
In the "Results of Operations" section eBay has the metric "Number of listings (3)" with the definition of the metric being "(3) Listings on eBay Marketplaces trading platforms during the period, regardless of whether the listing subsequently closed successfully."
The fact that eBay has the subject of "listings" in their official reports, belies pundits claims that the listing counts are of no concern.
Those who proffer the specious argument that the amounts involved are small and therefore inconsequential, must not deal often in large real world real time computer systems. Let's propose the scenario that someone or some group accidentally dumps a quarter million to a half million database TEST records into a PRODUCTION system. This same person or group then tells people in authority nonsense such as 'it's 35 thousand Usher'.
This is what those people would hear in the real world:
"You're Fired!", Donald Trump
eBay's official position on the number of listings.
eBay - Listings erroneously placed on eBay.com: 35,000
"An eBay spokesman told PC Magazine at the time that 5,000 shopping.com listings were erroneously placed on ebay.com. After sellers expressed doubt about that number in the comments section, eBay was asked to again confirm that it was indeed 5,000. The same spokesman responded Friday that he had originally told PC Magazine that eBay pulled 35,000 listings, but a review of the interview confirmed that he said 5,000." PC Magazine, 10 March 2008
4 March 2008 - "5,000 shopping.com listings were erroneously placed on ebay.com"
7 March 2008 - "eBay pulled 35,000 listings"
10 March 200 - "a review of the interview confirmed that he said 5,000"
Usher Lieberman is eBay's Spokesman, and is not an integral part of eBay's programming departments. He reports to the press what he's told. In the matter of contradictory statements or "false and misleading statements to the press" [SEC], the original source of the "5,000" and "35,000" counts should be investigated.
Our research regarding the listing counts during the February 29th Leap Day weekend.
Total Listings, Hard Count:
161,358 to 192,966 (161,358 + 31,608) to 241,368 (161,358 + 80,000)
Total Listings, Soft Count:
271,280 to 302,888 (271,280 + 31,608) to 351,280 (271,280 + 80,000)
Estimated Listings Count: 500,000 (rounded)
Total Listings Hard Count Methodology.
The "Hard Count" represents the total number of auction listings confirmed by screen shots, archives, and reported by AuctionBytes. In theory the Hard Count should equal or be close to the Soft Count. But in practice it is not an easy task to collect hard evidence, from multiple witnesses, after the fact.
The 31,608 figure derives from the AuctionBytes observation that "indicated the seller had over 80,000 listings on eBay.com."
AuctionBytes does not reveal the identity of that seller. Making it possible that the seller with "80,000" items is part of the list of observed sellers. The 31,608 figure is derived from taking "80,000" and subtracting the largest listing count reported, which is 48,392. In this way listing counts are not added in twice.
In other words, if the seller with item count of "48,392" (part of the observed list of sellers) actually has "80,000" items, the total should be 161,358 + 31,608. The 31,608 being the uncounted part of the "80,000" (80,000 - 48,392). The 31,608 can increase to a maximum of 80,000, depending on who the seller is or is not.
For instance in the case of this seller not being on the reported list of 14 sellers, the soft count would be 161,358 plus 80,000 or 241,368.
There is also the case of the count from AuctionBytes being completely wrong; 0 items.
The Hard Count ranges from a minimum of 161,358 items, to a maximum of 241,368 items.
Total Listings Soft Count Methodology.
The "Soft Count" represents the total number of auction listings reported, but not necessarily verified by screen captures, etc.. The figure of 271,280 is the lower limit of those reported observations. As in the Hard Count, the 31,608 figure derives from the AuctionBytes observation that "indicated the seller had over 80,000 listings on eBay.com."
The observed Soft Count ranges from a minimum of 271,280 items, to a maximum of 351,280 items.
Estimated Listing Count Methodology.
Using the Medved "EBay Auction Counts: February 24, 2008 to March 1, 2008" chart, an estimate can be made as to the number of listings removed.
Logically we're looking for an increase and subsequent rapid decrease of at least 161,358 (Hard Count) listings and up to 351,280 (Soft Count), during the weekend time frame.
As it turns out there is just such an occurrence. There is an auction count spike in the auction count beginning at about the "2/29" (09:00 PM PST, Midnight EST) line and ending at about the "3/2" (09:00 PM PST, Midnight EST) line. From a graphing standpoint this increase conveniently begins after a relatively flat period of auction listings.
That would be approximately 13,900,000 (peak) - 13,400,000 (base) = 500,000 listings
13,393,000 28-FEB-2008 04:30 AM PST, 07:30 AM EST. Initial low point; base.
13,910,000 29-FEB-2008 10:00 AM PST, 01:00 PM EST. Peak
13,454,000 01-MAR-2008 07:00 PM PST, 10:00 PM EST. Lowest point of the day.
Using Randy Smythe's 13.5 million average daily auction listings as a measure, the half-a-million auction listings represents 3.7% of the daily total. A significant amount as far as the report by eBay's Accountants to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is concerned.
Is There More?
The question arises, were there more "test" listings. Our answer is, you are free to ponder this question.
But think about this. eBay held a listing special beginning on March 1st. Historically auction counts rise during a listing special. Typically a million or more. How many listings would have to be removed to not only negate the expected listing count increase, but cause the count to fall?
And ponder this too. As a matter of good business, eBay does put back listings removed in error. Such an increase due to putting back deleted listings would show up much later on Medved ("EBay Auction Counts: March 2, 2008 to March 8, 2008"). Abet buried in subsequent listing specials and promotions.
eBay's 2008 Q1 (1st Quarter, January 01 to March 31) report to the U.S. Security and Exchange Commission should be interesting.
II. SDC_PROD Seller List and Counts
"The world isn't run by weapons anymore, or energy, or money. It's run by little ones and zeroes, little bits of data. It's all just electrons." Cosmo, Sneakers (1992)
We believe that none of the Shopping.com sellers were aware their items were being transferred to eBay.com. As stipulated by eBay, "Shopping.com listings appeared accidentally on eBay.com". It would be an interesting exercise to find out if the involved Shopping.com sellers were billed eBay.com listing fees at the time, and then credited afterwards.
SDC_PROD Seller List
This is a list of the fourteen (14) "sdc_prod" (shopping dot com) seller accounts that were located and reported, 29 February to 1 March 2008. Plus additional sdc_prod sellers that were located post event.
This list contains:
A brief description of the seller.
A link to the seller's eBay.com Feedback page.
A link to the current number of items by the sdc_prod seller.
A link to search Google for the specific sellers.
That link can help you perform a search of the Google archives for sdc_prod related material. Use the "repeat the search with the omitted results included" option to maximize the available data.
On Google links to eBay.com or ebay.auction.co.kr use the "Cached" link to obtain the archived data.
Because this issue involves eBay.com, ignore eBay Express references.
And be quick because the Google archive cache data is dynamic; changing from day to day.
The "reported listing count" of items by sdc_prod name seller on eBay.com. As reported 29 February to 1 March 2008. And where available.
Links to screen captures of these auction counts. Where available.
The total count from the screen captures, 161,358, is evidence that eBay Spokesman Usher Lieberman made a number of "false and misleading statements to the press" when he said on multiple occasions that "5,000 listings" or "35,000 listings" were involved.
Time permitting, this section will be updated.
* sdc_prod_301013_74 Shopping.com seller The Twister Group Member since Oct-18-06 in Illinois, United States
"Never underestimate the power of human stupidity." Robert Heinlein, Time Enough For Love (1973)
There are two basic explanations.
eBay deliberately elevated auction counts, in effect producing "materially false and misleading statements" to improve their stock price. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission violation. A simple plan based on the simple but stupid premise that 'no one will find this.' Orange jumpsuits all around.
Human (Computer) Error. A cadre of programmers are allowed to run large scale tests on a live system. And goofed.
We had planned to explore and write about each possibility, but we'll leave that for another time.
IV. "THIS IS NOT AN EBAY LISTING"
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." George Santayana, The Life of Reason (1905)
Event Timeframe
Like many incidents, there are events that lead up to it, follow it, are associated with it, or simply happen in the same time frame.
Ebay Inc's (NASDAQ:EBAY) listing numbers have demonstrated dramatic volatility during the 'Vladuz' security scare. Some Ebay users have suggested that the millions of fraudulent listings are significantly inflating Ebay's listing numbers.
In response, an Ebay spokesperson claims: "there just isn't enough information there to tie the swings in listings that they show to any one cause". They declined to comment as to the number of accounts that may have been compromised.
It is also suggested that Medved's calculations for Ebay's total of listing numbers are overestimated too. As the Ebay spokesperson confirms, the Medved statistics used to quantify Ebay's listing numbers "far exceed our real activity in this area".
"The bug was related to the gallery feature that allows users to place a small photo of their item on the initial search returns page, a spokesman said. EBay traditionally charged 35 cents to include a gallery photo, but as part of the policy changes that went into effect February 20, they are now free of charge. However, "the code actually rolled out three hours late, so there were a certain number of listings ... that didn't get gallery free" Usher Lieberman eBay Spokesman to PC Magazine, 4 March 2008
It is unclear from the PC Magazine article, if the "bug" was implemented on February 20th, the day of the "policy changes", or on February 29th.
When I search ebay or via google for test listings I only find a few hundred yet total ebay listings are now running at or above Feb 12th numbers of 12.4 m (before 20 cent listings and boycott) so I fail to see the importance of test listings in inflating numbers.
28 February 2008 04:30 PM PST, 7:30 PM EST (Eastern Standard Time)
eBay Auction count at lowest point of the day; 13,393,000 items.
Coincidentally, or not, at about the time many of eBay's employees head for home, the auction count begins to rise. Did some programmer turn something on, and leave for the day, intending to check on the code's progress the following morning?
Auction count rises to 13,405,000 by 07:30 PST, 10:30 EST.
"eBay is running a marketing campaign to encourage buyers to shop on its site by offering them coupons. One buyer sent AuctionBytes a coupon he had received (pictured) that offered $5 toward shipping on any one item. Part of the terms and conditions follows:
This Offer is valid only when you pay with, and seller accepts, PayPal. This Offer is intended for the recipient whose eBay User ID is printed on the Offer and purchase must be made on eBay.com with that eBay User ID. This Offer is not transferable.
This Offer is for one-time use. It may only be redeemed on the total shipping cost of an item or items on one purchase from a single seller, using a single method of shipping and single currency, in a single transaction. This Offer expires February 28, 2008 at 11:59:59 PM (PST)." AuctionBytes, Wed Feb 27 2008 18:04:36
The above statement is in response to the earlier part of the thread:
ExcludeSellers Issue Posted: Jan 10, 2008 11:40 AM Is there a limit on the number of Excluded Sellers that can be specified in a GetSearchResults call? I have several excluded sellers that keep returning search results. I have checked the XML for the call, and it looks correct.
Also, is it a problem if entries are duplicated? (I will be correcting this in any event.)
Re: ExcludeSellers Issue Posted: Jan 10, 2008 12:12 PM After further research, it looks like there is a limit of 100 excluded sellers. Can this limit be raised? stsi.com
Re: ExcludeSellers Issue Feb 29, 2008 4:27 AM "Also, is it possible to use wildcards for excluded sellers? For example, I'd like to exclude the various iterations of sdc_prod_*, instead of having to type in all the numbers that this seller uses...." stsi.com
. 29 February 2008 10:00 AM PST, 01:00 PM Eastern Standard Time
Medved "EBay Auction Counts" reaches maximum for the day of approximately 13,900,000 items. The previous low count was 13,393,000 items on February 28th at 04:30 PM PST, 7:30 EST. An increase of about half-a-million listings in 16.5 hours.
Coincidentally, or not, during the time many of eBay's employees show up at work, the auction count abruptly stops rising.
One scenario:
07:00AM (10:00AM EST) - Programmers apply brakes to sdc_prod application.
08:30AM (11:30AM EST) - Or so they thought, sdc_prod application continues to add listings.
A case could be made that by 10AM eBay applied working corrective action on the sdc_prod listing problem. Because at this point the auction count drops.
. 29 February 2008 01:00 PM PST, 04:00 PM Eastern Standard Time
Medved "EBay Auction Counts" drops slightly approximately 13,875,000 items, from 13,900,000 items. Last count of the February 29th chart.
.
29 February 2008
Regarding the events of "Friday night" 29 February 2008.
eBay's statements:
1) "a "bug" in its system had accidentally placed listings from eBay-owned shopping.com onto eBay.com late Friday night." However, "the code actually rolled out three hours late, so there were a certain number of listings ... that didn't get gallery free, so we were going back and fixing that" on Friday, the spokesman said. "What happened was, when we wrote the code to implement that fix in the database table, there was a string that was left on there that populated and sent shopping.com listings onto ebay.com that it shouldn't have." Approximately 5,000 listings were pulled from shopping.com, but they have since been removed, according to eBay." PC Magazine, 4 March 2008
2) "eBay spokesperson Usher Lieberman initially told AuctionBytes they appeared due to a test, but on Monday, said he was incorrect and that the listings were the result of a glitch. On Tuesday, Lieberman explained the nature of the glitch. Programmers rolled out code on Friday evening that was meant to credit certain listings that were eligible for free Gallery. The credit was due to them because eBay had promised sellers Gallery would be free for listings started at a certain time of day, and the code had been rolled out 3 hours past the deadline. Lieberman said the programmers inadvertently caused the Shopping.com listings to appear on eBay.com when it created and launched the script to credit the sellers' accounts for Gallery fees. Lieberman said fewer than 35,000 listings were affected by the glitch." AuctionBytes, 5 March 2008
3) "An eBay spokesman told PC Magazine at the time that 5,000 shopping.com listings were erroneously placed on ebay.com. After sellers expressed doubt about that number in the comments section, eBay was asked to again confirm that it was indeed 5,000. The same spokesman responded Friday that he had originally told PC Magazine that eBay pulled 35,000 listings, but a review of the interview confirmed that he said 5,000." PC Magazine, 10 March 2008
4) "Editor's Note: The eBay spokesman confirmed Monday that the number of postings pulled from shopping.com was indeed 35,000." PC Magazine, 10 March 2008
. 29 February 2008 06:41 PM PST
First responders to Shopping.com listing anomaly.
By this time, the Medved "EBay Auction Counts" are somewhere between 13,875,000 listings (29 February 2008 01:00 PM PST) and 13,502,000 listings (1 March 2008 08:30 AM PST). "Between" as the Medved chart is blank between those times.
A possible scenario would be that eBay has been deleting listings since 10:00 AM; at least 8 hours. Or we should say an eBay application has been deleting sdc_prod listings.
eBay's March 1st Listing Special begins in 5 hours 19 minutes.
Sounds more like a conspiracy to me. 30 of these kinds of ID's with 35K listings is 1M items. Imagine the kind of volume drop you can hide with 30, 60 or 90 or whatever number of these IDs.
cmiprch (1732 ) Feb-29-08 21:19 PST 48 of 418
So "sdc" = shopping dot com?
Nice listings boost if eBay injected everything on shopping.com
I have been collecting all ebay's padded listings and forwarding them to the FTC so they will investigate them. Everything you can do will help.They should not get away with the crap they are doing.Im going to do my best to make sure they dont.
windorphin (31 ) Feb-29-08 21:40 PST 4 of 273
Don't waste your time. They aren't fake listings. They are your replacements. They're bringing in the big guns now. Huge retailers to compete with.
you would think they would at least use different user names. SDC_prod....I guess that is easier to keep up with. SDC = shopping dot com.....brilliant. haaaaa
I think the API developer angle is probably where the answer lies. Someone is clearly testing auction formats and listings, and these are not meant to be bid on.
.
29 February 2008 10:31:50 PM PST, 12:31:50 CST &1:31:50 AM 1 March EST
12:31:50 AM CST "I see. Actually, this is not an eBay listing, the problem is it's a Shopping.com listing that is showing on our site by mistake." Evan M. A., eBay Live Help Customer Service
12:32:25 AM CST It is a current issue, yes, we have a bug on it. These are meant to be on shopping.com only but due to some reason are showing on eBay as well and can't be bought through the site." Evan M. A., eBay Live Help Customer Service
.
29 February 2008 10:35 PM PST
eBay user comments, edited.
badmomster (Private) Feb-29-08 20:35 PST 68 of 521
It seems to me that if Ebay is boosting their numbers with bogus auctions, that's an issue for the SEC.
Just curious, exactly what FTC code violation are you reporting them for?
And the SEC? It's an auction listing, not stock manipulation.
Going crazy will not help your cause.
aenthal (2243 ) Feb-29-08 23:04 PST 34 of 273
These bogus auctions are not a violation of anything. EBay has a right to put anything they wish on their web servers, and they apparently wish to use space up with displays of auctions that don't exist.
"He said he had made a mistake when he called the Shopping.com listings a test on Saturday morning. He was trying to track it down and after talking to a few people, felt comfortable saying it was a test, and subsequently found out the listings had appeared accidentally. Usher said it was his fault for initially getting it wrong." Ina Steiner, AuctionBytes, 4 March 2008 04:02:46 AM PST
AuctionBytes does not report this fact, "80,000 listings," for 4 days.
.
1 March 2008 12:00:01 AM PST, 3:00:01 AM Easter Standard Time
eBay listing upgrade special, "2 days only March 1-2", begins. eBay sellers can list products at reduced prices. Historically the auction counts rise significantly during these eBay specials.
There is no 12:00:01 AM count per sec, as there is a gap in the record from 01:00 PM PST (04:00 PM EST) February 29th to 08:30 AM PST (11:30 AM EST) March 1st.
Here is a copy of the list again for those that missed it. sdc_prod_434012 # of listings 35002 sdc_prod_9124_14 # of listings 48395 sdc_prod_9074_35 # of listings 21401 sdc_prod_9452 # of listings 24501 sdc_prod_301013_74 # of listings 27291 sdc_prod_9352_67 # of listings 30278 sdc_ prod_ 9055 # of listings 1925 sdc_prod_9021_2 # of listings 12233 sdc_prod_9391_43 #oflistings 11100
moopy_inc (5562 ) Mar-01-08 00:17 PST 459 of 786
well, we all saw it, others on powersellersunite.com has seen it. I just wish these were found during the day. So many more people could have seen them.
O.K. they are right back at it. I was double checking the Ids and these 4 have auctions listed again. Take a look. sdc_prod_301013_74 sdc_prod_310426 sdc_prod_9352_67 sdc_prod_9452
"Mystery listings are appearing on eBay that don't allow shoppers to bid or buy. The listings appear to be feeds from Shopping.com sellers. A look at the User ID sdc_prod_301013_74, for example, shows the seller has 27,076 listings - but the ones we clicked on did not have bid or buy buttons."
Considering eBay does not report figures, it seems kinda like the conspiracies are rampant again. Because 3rd parties out there attempt to circumvent and create programs to provide folks this, it is just not logical for eBay to gain anything from this.
I agree with thizzwear completely on this. And Thizz, does not matter what date they were doing this testing, all the chicken littles will make that date fit into the agenda which they have. There is no winning for eBay for anything they do, the Chicken Littles of the world will use their twisted logic to make it appear they did this for some adverse reasoning.
The more these chicken littles talk, the less eductated they look. It has really become a joke to read all these things that are being said now.
"I'm betting Murphys Law is driving this event rather than any evil empire."
"For me this isn't a significant issue in isolation but there is a potentially more worrying aspect to this story. Many readers will share the belief of many that eBay has never been good at introducing new or changed code leading many users to feel like Beta testers all too often. With the amount of changes planned for the coming months I have a hunch today is just one of a string of "cock ups" we will be reading and reporting in the near future."
I don't believe ebay has done anything with the intent to manipulate or deceive. The point is that IF whatever sort of glitch this is has mistakenly over inflated the numbers, then eBay is responsible for making the shareholders aware of the accounting errors IF the mistake has an impact on the stock values and/or IF the errors impact the financial reports to the shareholders. I don't know about the whole casino scenario you've got going, I was thinking more along the lines of Enron and such.
eBay cannot be held accountable for any errors if they can say that they didn't know, which is why someone must have proof that an officer of eBay or PREFERABLY THE GENERAL COUNSEL FOR EBAY has been made aware of the possibility of a considerable accounting error in the financial reports to the shareholders.
shwp1 (1919 ) Mar-01-08 07:03 PST 681 of 878
I asked this earlier and it's still nagging at me.
Someone...[forgive me but I have forgotten who], posted a link to another forum where one of the sdc###### was inquiring how many id's they could have... The were told 100....how many did they need? sdc###### responded 400 or 500
soooooooooo
If sdc= shoppingdotcom and shoppingdotcom is owned by Ebay
Isn't that like asking yourself a question...and doing it where everyone can hear [read] you ask?
the*katy*workshop (1468 ) Mar-01-08 07:11 PST 683 of 878
27076 items found (Save this search) Show only: Items from seller sdc_prod_301013_74
The absolute ONLY way for these items to show "by accident" is if the eBay techs included them in the database. If this was done "on accident" then those tech should absolutely be fired, because they are mixing two different databases and that is potentially a MAJOR screwup.
It seems that they probably have done this on purpose, because it's highly unlikely that the two different databases share the same table titles and attributes. Meaning that the SDC listings would have had to have been converted to fit the eBay database before they would show up, otherwise they would just error out and potentially bring down the whole eBay database.
Something is not right with this...you cannot just have stuff appear "on accident"...not when you're dealing with databases.
19808 items found (Save this search) Show only: Items from seller sdc_prod_9452
.
1 March 2008 08:10 AM PST, 16:10 GMT
200k Shopping.com items appear on eBay TameBay Author: Chris Dawson Posted at: Saturday, March 1st, 2008 at 4:10 pm Tags for this post: eBay.com, shopping.com, Snafu
Excerpt:
"User names such as sdc_prod_9124_14 with some 48,000 eBay listings appeared, although currently all the listings appear to have been removed. SDC is the acronym for shopping.com, the shopping comparison site owned by eBay.
sdc_prod_9124_14 The listings had no bid/bin links, simply a link to add to watched items leading so speculation that eBay are using them to increase listing numbers. A more rational explanation is that some one made an error in launching Shopping.com listings onto eBay and the error was swiftly reversed."
Just like they were nailed cold with the "shipping stars" snafu, they are nailed cold with this one. Of course they will announce it was a simple mistake, and get rid of the fake listings.
.
1 March 2008 08:30 AM PST, 11:30 AM EST
Medved "EBay Auction Counts" approximately 13,502,000 items. The auction count was previously 13,875,000 listings (29 February 2008 01:00 PM PST)
Eight and a half hours into eBay's listing upgrade special, "2 days only March 1-2", and the auction count is falling.
I read an article recently that Ebay (who owns Shopping) was going to start having some of the Shopping feeds shown on Ebay. That was one of the reasons I signed up for Shopping but then found that all my Amazon listings were already on Shopping. So no point in competing with my self and using my own money to be seen on Shopping when Amazon pays and does it for me.
Chris, it’s likely that it was a slip-up. There have been discussions about integrating SDC listings into to eBay for awhile. These listings would not have shown up on eBay.com in the form that they did if eBay hadn’t set them up this way. So I would say it was a slip-up before a test. Eventually we will see SDC listing on the main platform.
I agee with you that it wasn’t eBay trying to inflate listing numbers.
I don't know if it's a glitch, hack or purposeful deception. However, what makes it curious is all the auctions I looked at started last Thursday the day after the listing sale ended.
I must have missed that one. These are the ones I found, with last night's and this morning's results shown. That list you have only shows 10,000 counts ... could have been much more than that:
ID found:...............first shot..... Now sdc_prod_9452...........19808....still there sdc_prod_30103_74....27076....still there sdc_prod_9055............1925.....zero now sdc_prod_442675_57...4702.....zero now sdc_prod_9124_14.......42578...zero now sdc_prod_9090............ 24501...zero now sdc_prod_434012..........35000...zero now
. 1 March 2008 01:02 PM PST, 03:02 PM CST
eBay Customer Service Agent (Lanie R.) and an eBay customer: 15:02 Agent Sent Message: I'm sorry for the inconvenience.This is actually an issue on the site right now I'm afraid. This is actually a Shopping.com listing that's appearing incorrectly on eBay. 15:03 Agent Sent Message: Our Technical team is working on getting resolved though, and I had this reported for you so we can add your account to the list. 15:03 Customer: Do these incorrect listings show up in ebays total listings/ Wouldn't they scew the listings totals? 15:04 Agent Sent Message: Oh, no it shouldn't though. 15:05 Agent Sent Message: The team is checking on the accounts of the sellers you reported as well for further investigation. 15:05 Customer: Shoudn't or absolutely doesn't? 15:05 Agent Sent Message: Absolutely doesn't.This is only a glitch on the search pages. 15:06 Agent Sent Message: You can check it from time to time to see it not on the eBay pages, only on Shopping.com 15:06 Customer: can you explain that a little further? 15:08 Customer: I'm not familiar with shopping.com. Why would their listings show up on ebay. Anf the one I mentionaed has ebay seller feedback. 15:08 Agent Sent Message: Sure! In the eBay account of the seller for items sold at eBay, it shouldn't get reflected, but if you were referring to the "items from seller" link for all items he is selling, I'm afraid the Shopping.com items will also appear and is confirmed as a tec 15:08 Agent Sent Message: hnical glitch. 15:09 Customer: can you respond to my last question also? 15:09 Agent Sent Message: Sorry for the confusion, Shopping.com is a specialty site owned by eBay but we handle separate accounts. It's similar to Express or Half.com 3/1/2008 15:10 Agent Sent Message: Ah, okay, Here's what happens, this particular seller has an account with SHopping.com to sell items, which is a different one as an eBay seller.
Cyoung 67- Another poster and I caught that auction in the act last night. OP did a “snapshot” when it was at 35,000 listings and sent it to ABC NEWS. I was watching it around the same time and the listings went from 37,000 at the first point. I checked in on it 4 more times, 2nd time I think it was 17,000 auctions, then 7,000 and then 5,000 and finally in went to 536. Now it is at zero. OP and I both posted our findings but cannot find it this morning. Surprise, Surprise!
Would it not stand to reason, that if some deal was worked out, with say Shopping.com and premier members that pay to Shopping.com get free exposure listings with eBay, that in fact it is not costing them anything to have these listed in an eBay store account? That would make sense. . I do not profess to know what arrangement that Shopping.com merchants have, but it seems I read something to that effect somewhere.
Well on Monday the Expanded Seller Protection enrollment link showed up for a period of time before getting removed.
Maybe this was some sort of a test like that where it went "live" and then was taken down.
On one hand I would think if it were a test, they would have used a much smaller amount of listings so it wasn't so visible and on the other hand maybe they wanted to see how large a volume they could handle for sellers as a means of luring users back from amazon or not lose them to amazon.
And then also maybe they wanted to see what current, knowledgeable users would say about the listings to quickly find out what "goofs" there were.
"Today the Blogs and eBay Finance forums and eBay Seller forums are buzzing with examples of mysterious listings of items on which you cannot bid or which you cannot buy. These number in tens of thousands on seller accounts that were located today."
sdc_prod_301013_74 has been a member since Oct-18-06.
If you view the Text-format only page for their listings, it's very interesting. I am viewing it with 200 items per page. - there are 27076 items found (but only 10000 can be viewed in the Text-format list) - The first page of listings were started Jun-04-07 and ended on Nov-01-07 (why are they still listed in Text-format only? The item #s are invalid.) - On the 15th page of listings, approx. half were started Apr-19-07 and ended Nov-15-07 16:19:44 PST. That's approx. 2900 listings that ended before Nov-15-07, and should no longer be on the site. - All the rest of the listings (approx 7100) were started on Feb-25-08 and will end Mar-26-08, between 14:22:26 PDT and 14:32:16 PDT. They are 30 day listings.
There's been a lot of this going on this past month. Thousands of listings within weeks or even days and about 20% FB, if any. Odd times.
username: sdc_prod_301013_74 has 27291 listings. username: sdc_prod_9090 has 32601 listings. username: sdc_prod_9352_67 has 30278 listings. username: sdc_prod_9074_35 has 21481 listings
You want them to let you know every time they do tests? You think other sites let you know when they do test? You're dreaming!
sojo2004 (2698 ) Mar-01-08 18:23 PST 78 of 333
OK, this is what ebay says about test auctions:
Guidelines for Test Listings
Listings in the Test Auction category must be clearly labeled as a ’test’, both in the listing title and description. No more than 10 test listings should run at once by a single account. Accounts that leave or receive feedback in the Test Auction category must be used for test purposes only. This means that members must use a different account to leave or receive feedback for test purposes than is used for buy or sell on the site. Accounts found to be in violation of this guideline will be subject to immediate suspension.
Any Feedback left on test listings should be clearly labeled ‘test’.
All ’test’ feedback is subject to removal at any time, at eBay's discretion.
Normal listing fees will be charged when listing in the test category.
But I guess that just applies to members, not the management.
But in answer to pepin -- yes, if we have to clearly state a test listing is a test listing, then I DO think ebay should have to do the same.
sojo
Things are going swimmingly, thank you for asking.
. 1 March 2008 07:00 PM PST, 10:00 PM EST (Eastern Standard Time)
Medved "EBay Auction Counts" approximately 13,455,000 items. Auction count at the lowest point of the day.
Comments please? Just saw this at the very tail end of a thread in the Feedback Forum. Thought it was appropriate to mention here. (They had a different item number from this seller posted, but I'm not sure I can do that.)
No price, no way to bid on it (I tried $30 just to see what would happen - it said transaction blocked, cannot bid on this kind of item) and if you click on see sellers other listings he has 35K+ others. And it's a zero account. Location - CA. Website in auction too.
How the heck would you even list something up with no way to bid on it? This is either just leading to their website and bigtime circumvention or it's eBay themselves inflating the numbers. Interesting either way.
What do the experts think?
. 1 March 2008 08:30 PM PST, 11:30 PM Eastern Standard Time
Medved "EBay Auction Counts" approximately 13,460,000 items. Last count of the March 1st chart.
Note auction count spike beginning at the "2/29" (09:00 PM PST, Midnight EST) line and ending at the "3/2" (09:00 PM PST, Midnight EST) line.
Yesterday, I tried to bid on one of the SDC listings. And, this was not an eBay Express listing. It was one of the active auction format listings. And, the page would not accept my bid.
I put the item in my watched items, and it's still there. But now, when I click the item, the auction has been pulled. And when I search those listings for that seller, they are showing no auctions- so all 27K of the auction format listings have been pulled.
.
2 March 2008 08:26:53 AM PST
Comment, edited.
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 08:26:53 -0800 (PST)
The evidence is consistent with that conclusion, but is not yet proof of that. This could yet be hacking, or API/server malfunction. It could also be an unannounced "test" that accidentally had the "unintended" side effect of inflating traffic, right, sure.
In any event, there clearly are "fake Ebay listings", and in large numbers. Large enough to materially affect traffic count? I suspect we'll know in a few days.
The interesting thing to watch here is whether or not this phenomenon continues, and if it stops, what happens to the traffic reports. -- Regards, Bob Niland
Let's revamp this weekends events. 1. at 18:41 pst Friday evening a thread was started about listings that could not be bid on or bought. 2. between 12 am pst and 3 am Saturday these listings were being pulled. 3. These so called TEST listings if they were only TEST listings would have no reason to be pulled and some of the sdc_prod_### id's narued. 4. Then the thread of these findings is removed along with any that mention it. 5. why please tell me why, if this was only a TEST has it become an issue to remove them and the threads discussing them.
markd13 (84 ) Mar-02-08 11:19 PST 38 of 432
I see the Conspiracy Nut Jobs are out in full force.
And then we have the Free Speech nut jobs who have never read the Constitution or Bill of Rights and yammer on about something they have no knowledge. They don't seem to understand it doesn't cover entities like eBay.
But then again when have facts every stopped a nut job from their ranting.
.
2 March 2008 02:31 PM PST, 05:31 PM Easter Standard Time
"if they were using these thousands of test listings to skewer 3rd party listing stats generators like,Medved Charts and PowerSellersUnite.com it is outright fraud!"
.
2 March 2008 02:32 PM PST
eBay System Status Announcement Board ***Resolved: Shopping.com listings on eBay*** "Some Shopping.com listings appeared accidentally on eBay.com over the past two days. This system issue has been resolved. We apologize for any confusion or inconvenience this may have caused."
That was ebays pathetic excuse for 400,000 listings that all appeared out of nowhere and then disappeared almost as quick and looked nothing like any other ebay listings and if thats the case...then ebay is a very unsafe place to shop! How in the hell do 400,000 listings "accidentally" appear? That means that your private information on this site is no longer safe if stuff from any other site can just somehow magically appear on this one!
magisterrex (6944 ) Mar-02-08 15:54 PST 170 of 418
I don't know why so many people are quick to ASSume that eBay is an evil corporate entity that wants to steal their souls and use them as currency whilst dealing with the Devil.
When I last checked, you were supposed to be INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty. From the bizarre, over-the-top posts on this thread, I have no idea why some of you even sell here.
I know that if I felt that strongly about eBay, I would do what Bruce is doing, and exit, stage left.
"If the hundreds of thousands listings you cannot Buy Now or Bid on on eBay site are just an innocent mistake / glitch or have a legitimate reason to be there, why would eBay moderators be so diligent in removing posts from their forums discussing these? Although the eBay forum thread has been removed by eBay Moderators, Google cache still has some of the posts"
By the way, at the moment, I don't believe eBay did this on purpose to inflate listings. While it's a possibility, I would hope eBay's not that stupid. I really can't see it happening as there are just too many people who would have to have been involved to do that.
in-weave (7349 ) Mar-02-08 16:56 PST 197 of 418
Some Shopping.com listings appeared accidentally on eBay.com over the past two days. This system issue has been resolved. We apologize for any confusion or inconvenience this may have caused.
I don't think we've seen the end of this....and, in some ways, I don't want to know what carp is coming. There's a reason they "accidentally" appeared. eBay may not have wanted anyone to notice them so that may be the accident but I'll be very surpised if we don't see something relating to shopping.com listings/eBay by the middle of the summer.
. 2 March 2008 8:30 PM PST, 11:30 PM Eastern Standard Time
Medved "EBay Auction Counts" approximately 13,330,000 items. Last count of the March 2nd chart.
Why don't you start your own auction site posseauctions.com and make it perfect ...
I.E. the first website ever that has no glitches, and we'll all use it! Be sure to make a possee discussion board too!!
Remember it has to be perfect just like you, and never have any issues/glitches at all, even if millions of people are all using it at once.
Especially be sure to make a perfect message board! So we won't run the risk of not getting your daily/hourly/minutely/secondly words of possee wisdom!
Let us know when its ready possee!
.
2 March 2008 11:59 PM PST, 2:59 AM 3 March Eastern Standard Time
According to the Medved "EBay Auction Counts", at the time the listing special ended the count was approximately 13,355,000 items. The count at the start of the listing special was about 13,502,000 listings. An overall decrease.
Regarding the events and comments of Monday March 3rd.
"I spoke to eBay's Usher Lieberman during the IMA conference on Monday. He said he had made a mistake when he called the Shopping.com listings a test on Saturday morning. He was trying to track it down and after talking to a few people, felt comfortable saying it was a test, and subsequently found out the listings had appeared accidentally. Usher said it was his fault for initially getting it wrong." Ina Steiner, AutionBytes, 4 March 2008 04:02:46
"they apparently choose to take this action in an effort to reduce the visibiltiy of the test or accident, whichever it was.........eBay needs to get their stories STRAIGHT!
My Opinion If it really was a test, eBay should have announced it before they ran it, on the system announcement board. This was no accident. eBay rarely does anything by accident, but if they do, it is corrected very quickly, not 2 or more days later."
lol we wanted ebay to acknowledge the glitches so we would know about them and wouldn't run around trying to find out if there was something we were doing wrong. Now people are using the notifications to complain that there are glitches?
"In fact we recently saw Shopping.com listings on the eBay.com site, which gives you an idea of their plans. eBay's response to the SDC listings was; "Some Shopping.com listings appeared accidentally on eBay.com over the past two days. This system issue has been resolved. We apologize for any confusion or inconvenience this may have caused." Notice it wasn't an error, it was accidental. Believe me, the accidental part was, that they showed up now, before they were supposed to. I have a hunch we will see SDC listings on the eBay platform sooner rather than later; first as a test and if that goes over well, they will roll them out site wide."
It now has been about a week that the PAID BASHERS community has been busy polluting our beloved board with sorry comments about how eBay has floated or artifically increased its listing. Maybe one day these PAID BASHERS who are PAID money to spread lies and misinformation can discuss the matter with their boss and get an answer for us all. Question: How can you accuse eBay ...
I spoke to eBay's Usher Lieberman during the IMA conference on Monday. He said he had made a mistake when he called the Shopping.com listings a test on Saturday morning. He was trying to track it down and after talking to a few people, felt comfortable saying it was a test, and subsequently found out the listings had appeared accidentally. Usher said it was his fault for initially getting it wrong.
I asked Usher if he could tell me more, and he could not. I asked him if we might expect to see Shopping.com listings on eBay in the future, or eBay.com listings on Shopping. He said eBay is looking at a lot of different things and can't speculate on anything.
"Lots of things are on the table," he said.
. 4 March 2008 04:02 AM PST
Regarding events and comments taking place on Tuesday March 4th.
"On Tuesday, Lieberman explained the nature of the glitch. Programmers rolled out code on Friday evening that was meant to credit certain listings that were eligible for free Gallery. The credit was due to them because eBay had promised sellers Gallery would be free for listings started at a certain time of day, and the code had been rolled out 3 hours past the deadline." AuctionBytes, 5 March 2008
"When the bug first emerged on Friday, the spokesman told a reporter that it was actually a planned test. "But it wasn't a test. It ended up being a bug," he said. "So I ate a little bit of crow on that.""
"EBay denied that any forum deletions were intentional. If any posts were taken down "it was accidental," the spokesman said. "We're not afraid of hearing from our community and allowing them to post and discuss things and be angry on our boards.""
It is quite possible that the messy matter is approaching a large fan
Approximately 5,000 listings were pulled from shopping.com, but they have since been removed, according to eBay. (from the PCMAG article)
That is so far from reality that it is ludicrous -- Not only ludicrous but so easily shot through of holes that it borders on management malpractice -- and when it is shown to be GROSSLY understated will invite ever more scrutiny --
We may be seeing a company beginning to circle the wagons and the result will be downright ugly --
If only companies that make major goofs would read the Johnson and Johnson Tylenol Story -- It is a roadmap to not just successful damage control but also to public trust --
Although public trust is at risk -- eBAY is taking an even larger risk with shareholder trust -- A trust that if lost will lead to the dissolution of the company -- an extreme that is unlikely to be sure -- but a needless exposure non the less
Continued pressure here would be far more effective than any boycott in bending managements will -- This misstep is an opportunity that the dissenters will be foolish to waste
I would start by looking for deleted in threads on the net and follow with screen shots of them and the 5000 listings -- followed by 5000 more a day later -- and on and on --
There are now at least two main stream media giants with interest -- an opportunity that is priceless
The eBay owned Korean website often mirrors ebay.com auctions. Many of these sdc_prod_ listings are still live on their website. If you want to find them, go to Goog and enter the specific sdc_prod_ number, leave a space, and then enter site:ebay.auction.co.kr
When the results are shown, click on "repeat the search with the omitted results included."
You can find the sdc numbers on various websites/blogs. The eBay Korean website only shows the listings that are currently active and not the ones that have scrolled off but there are still quite a few.
.
5 March 2008
Regarding the events and comments of Wednesday March 5th.
AuctionBytes releases the "80,000" figure to eBay and the public. They first observed this figure on March 1st. Four days earlier.
"However, he had no explanation for the fact that when AuctionBytes looked at one Shopping.com selling account on Saturday morning, it indicated the seller had over 80,000 listings on eBay.com." AuctionBytes, 5 March 2008
AuctionBytes becomes the first large news organization to report a count from direct observation of the situation. However AuctionBytes has not substantiated their claim with screen shots.
"Of the accusations of listing count manipulation, Lieberman said, "To think that we'd do that now is outrageous."" AuctionBytes, 5 March 2008
"When Shopping.com listings appeared on eBay.com last week, sellers pointed to it as an example of eBay attempting to boost listing numbers."
"AuctionBytes previously reported that several discussion threads had been removed, including one linked to in the original blog post published on Saturday.
Most sellers are likely taking little notice of the dust-up. Those who are suspicious may be unlikely to be satisfied with eBay's response."
Approximately 5,000 listings were pulled from shopping.com, but they have since been removed, according to eBay.
From the AB article
Lieberman said the programmers inadvertently caused the Shopping.com listings to appear on eBay.com when it created and launched the script to credit the sellers' accounts for Gallery fees.
Lieberman said fewer than 35,000 listings were affected by the glitch.
I am going to start a lottery methinks --
Whoever gets closest to the next eBAY estimated number of misplaced SDC listings will receive --
An all expense day trip to Leavenworth with full visitors passes and change for the vending machines -- While there they can visit the eBAY Exec of their choice
If both "buy" the explainations will likely go no where.
Should the SEC investigate there will be no buying of stories -- IMO
They are probably one of the scariest Regulatory bodies that Wall Street deals with -- They have teeth and are not at all shy about biting -- They are also pretty straight forward and fair without leaning in any particulat direction to meet an agenda
My attorney and accountant are also preparing letters to be sent to the State Attorney General requesting a watch on the situation with some of the "facts" that have surfaced attached as an addendum -- In that the Street is located here many a firm has been put in the hot seat through that AG Office even though technically domocilled elsewhere.
I am still jumping to no conclusions -- BUT -- The more the story changes the antsier I become --
jake-deals-4u (700 ) Mar-05-08 08:16 PST 213 of 333
preparing letters to be sent to the State Attorney General requesting a watch on the situation with some of the "facts
Too bad im sure the facts are' Everybody uses eBay at their OWN RISK via a user agreemant that is NOT compulsory, its voluntary.
And im sure theres probably an 12th grade HS kid that could explain that its eBays business & they can do as they dang well please with their OWN SITE + if someone doesnt like it, they are FREE to leave!
OTOH i havent quite figured out why someone who is a stockholder ( at their own FREE WILL & PROFIT ) would bad-mouth & spread bad-will at a company that they have a personal financial stake in , far & above the average site user.
If i was so upset at a company that i held stock in, i would sell that stock ASAP reguardless of P/L
pepins4b8e (21 ) Mar-05-08 08:41 PST 217 of 426
Carl, I own stock myself (although I'm sure not to your big wig level ). I fail to get a wedgie about this because while I see the listing numbers as an indicator, it is of small importance to me compared to the quarter-end results.
I guess we'll see if shareholders tend to think like me, or like you on this. I'm not criticizing your position. I just think that the press much prefers to follow Scarlett Johansson selling an evening with her on eBay versus some nebulous conspiracy about the number of listings on eBay.
La huelga de eBay ha sido más que un éxito. No fue sólo una caída del 13% de los artículos listados. Como sospechábamos eBay ha estado inflando artificialmente el número de artículos listados por 2 razones:
1) Para que los huelguistas nos desanimáramos haciéndonos creer que nuestra huelga era una huelga que llevábamos a cabo sólo unos cuantos vendedores.
2) PAra engañar a la bolsa.
La noticia acaba de salir en la propia CNN de EE.UU. Si se confirma la estafa en bolsa por parte de eBay estaría violando una Ley Federal muy seria y la multa que les caerá será de espanto, con el añadido de la mala reputación internacional que se producirá en el mercado financiero mundial de esta empresa y efectivo negativo en sus acciones.
Como véis, compañeros, cuando planatamos cojones y ovarios unidos, incluso podemos enfrentarnos contra las multinacionales y pisarles el cuello como ellos nos lo pisan a nosotros. Mis felicitaciones a todos los currantes vendedores de eBay y la solidaridad y apoyo de muchísimos compradores. Lo estamos consiguiendo. Van a venir más huelgas. Y vamos a seguir dándoles caña hasta que nos quiten el pie del cuello. Si tratan de hundirnos se hundirán ellos con nosotros.
"But could there be something a little more sinister taking place on the site? Rumors are definitely swirling that the site has actually been padding its numbers with fake item listings. eBay wouldn't dare do such a thing, would it? It has already admitted that a "bug" in the system did in fact insert some fake listings into the site's database. The question is, was this really a bug, or did the site knowingly inflate its listings?"
Why don't they do it on there stupid playgroud thing they set up?
ALL companies I know of have a test bed server to try out new things. They don't want to risk problems on the servers that make them money or are mission critical.
I spent 23 1/2 years with HP working with high end servers before retiring so I'm absolutely certain that a company would not risk problems running tests on a live system.
In my opinion, eBay is padding their listings.
vik*nan (33 ) Mar-05-08 23:25 PST 48 of 70
ALL companies I know of have a test bed server to try out new things.
a "sandbox" --- system or network to try out new software and equipment before deploying them to the production network.
Tests are never made on a production network even in smaller companies
aenthal (2241 ) Mar-05-08 23:59 PST 54 of 70
I don't care if eBay pads their listings. What will it get them? A larger count on their server? And what will that get them? More space used up on their server. And what will that get them? Nothing. Fake auctions don't bring in money, even if you put up a million of them.
I tend to agree that this is technical phenomenon, not a Pinocchio problem. But yes, they also have a Pinocchio problem, and an ostrich problem, and a robot problem (se habla Fortran because there are no humans behind that curtain, working the strings).
Let them tell all the Pinocchio versions of reality that they want. You can't turn a delusion into reality, no matter how many times you repeat it, no matter how much fake evidence you create to support it. Sometimes karma is sleeping. But in eBay's case it is hungry, and it will bite them in the butt eventually.
But don't worry about how they expose that butt before karma gets them. Just be glad that it eventually will.
windorphin (31 ) Mar-06-08 06:15 PST 61 of 70
They use the numbers to show their stockholders that listings are not decreasing. Therefore they are lying and manipulating stock prices.
The analogy drawn about a restaurant filling their seats with mannequins with stockholders driving past is a good one. It is just as meaningless, and nobody will get in trouble for it.
It would only be a violation if they somehow cooked the books to show that those mannequins had eaten and paid.
Current Registrar: NETWORK SOLUTIONS, LLC. IP Address: 66.135.194.100 (ARIN & RIPE IP search)
shopping.com's provider is pnap.net
NS2ANY.SHOPPING.COM NS1ANY.SHOPPING.COM
Current Registrar: MARKMONITOR INC. IP Address: 64.94.186.80 (ARIN & RIPE IP search)
uplatewhattodo (18 ) Mar-06-08 21:18 PST 11 of 31
AS a techie myself, I do have to disagree with this analysis a bit. Everything about DNS and IP's etc has to do with how eBay and shopping.com provide the informaton out to the world. It says nothing as to how that information is stored in the database or databases. If they are sharing databases distributed across their internal networks, or even storage arrays are being shared by the two systems then it's possible.
They did say they were running a script that caused it which means they were running data directly into the database system(s) and bypassing all the interfaces.
A very bad idea to mess with a database that way if you don't know what you are doing, but it does make it possible. And it would violate Sarbanes Oxley if they didn't cross their t's and dot their i's, which they apparently did not do.
.
6 March 2008
Despite eBay's announcement of March 2nd, that "system issue has been resolved", 'accidental' auction listings can still be found.
think the whole thing was filed under rumors speculations
these links that ur bringin here they are written by a bunch of nobodies ur credibility is in the drink, u believe everything u read, u realy expect us to believe this junk i think what's goin on here is worse than what is goin on at ebay. too bad too a shame this forum is wrecked
"I complain about eBay as much as the next guy and they certainly need to revamp their whole PR department and communicate better with sellers but this padding of listings is a non-starter."
"An eBay spokesman told PC Magazine at the time that 5,000 shopping.com listings were erroneously placed on ebay.com."
"eBay was asked to again confirm that it was indeed 5,000." "The same spokesman responded Friday that he had originally told PC Magazine that eBay pulled 35,000 listings"
"a review of the interview confirmed that he said 5,000."
"Editor's Note: The eBay spokesman confirmed Monday that the number of postings pulled from shopping.com was indeed 35,000."
The eBay computer engineers do give us software which has glitches and bugs, so I can see someone making a colossal error. But technically, can this error even be caused?
"Lieberman said the programmers inadvertently caused the Shopping.com listings to appear on eBay.com when it created and launched the script to credit the sellers' accounts for Gallery fees."
It sounds as though they would be working with accounting software, not launching listings. Very bizarre.
"Die Stellungnahmen der amerikanischen eBay-Sprecher trugen auch nicht unbedingt zur Erhellung bei. In sich widersprechenden Statements war von Tests, Versehen oder Irrtümern die Rede. Ähnlich verwirrende Auskünfte gab es auch für Kunden, die sich bei „Live-Help“ direkt informieren wollten."
"Last weekend, first rumours, then facts, emerged regarding the mass insertion of listings with no bid or buy-now button, which many speculated were deliberately added to mask the effects of the seller boycott. Throughout the bloggosphere, bloggers dependant on eBay for their content, and ad-click revenues, gave San Jose the benefit of the doubt. Ina Steiner of AuctionBytes even interviewed a senior eBay bod, and both Randy Smythe and eBay UK’s tame bay gave reasons why it had to be a glitch or site test, rather than something from the dirty tricks department. First eBay spokesman Usher Leiberman said it was a test, then said it wasn’t, and then declined to comment further. Posts appeared on eBay announcement boards, and have been all over forums on both sides of the Atlantic."
.
10 March 2008
Despite eBay's announcement of March 2nd that "system issue has been resolved", 'accidental' auction listings can still be found.
Trotz der Ankündigungen seitens vieler US-Verkäufer, während des Streiks vom 18. bis 25. Februar keine Angebote zu listen sind die Angebotszahlen bei ebay.com im fraglichen Zeitraum fast nicht gesunken.
Eine genauere Erklärung dafür findet sich natürlich nicht im ebay-Forum sondern extern.
A: We've altered the title to avoid being labeled as SPAM. Apparently Google considers variations of "sdc_prod" and "Shopping.com" to be SPAM, and removes direct links to such articles and items. Apparently late last year eBay began flooding Google with Shopping.com and sdc_prod* "advertising". Google's standard reaction to advertising SPAM is death by link removal.
// // //
The right to publish this news article - U.S. Supreme Court - 1988
At the heart of the First Amendment is the recognition of the fundamental importance of the free flow of ideas and opinions on matters of public interest and concern. "[T]he [485 U.S. 46, 51] freedom to speak one's mind is not only an aspect of individual liberty - and thus a good unto itself - but also is essential to the common quest for truth and the vitality of society as a whole." Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc., 466 U.S. 485, 503 -504 (1984). We have therefore been particularly vigilant to ensure that individual expressions of ideas remain free from governmentally imposed sanctions. The First Amendment recognizes no such thing as a "false" idea. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323, 339 (1974). As Justice Holmes wrote, "when men have realized that time has upset many fighting faiths, they may come to believe even more than they believe the very foundations of their own conduct that the ultimate good desired is better reached by free trade in ideas - that the best test of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market . . . ." Abrams v. United States, 250 U.S. 616, 630 (1919) (dissenting opinion).
The sort of robust political debate encouraged by the First Amendment is bound to produce speech that is critical of those who hold public office or those public figures who are "intimately involved in the resolution of important public questions or, by reason of their fame, shape events in areas of concern to society at large." Associated Press v. Walker, decided with Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts, 388 U.S. 130, 164 (1967) (Warren, C. J., concurring in result). Justice Frankfurter put it succinctly in Baumgartner v. United States, 322 U.S. 665, 673 -674 (1944), when he said that "[o]ne of the prerogatives of American citizenship is the right to criticize public men and measures." Such criticism, inevitably, will not always be reasoned or moderate; public figures as well as public officials will be subject to "vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks," New York Times, supra, at 270. "[T]he candidate who vaunts his spotless record and sterling integrity cannot convincingly cry `Foul!' when an opponent or an industrious reporter attempts [485 U.S. 46, 52] to demonstrate the contrary." Monitor Patriot Co. v. Roy, 401 U.S. 265, 274 (1971).
The eBay Shopping.com Affair aka "The eBay Leap Day Auction Count Affair" aka "The eBay SDC_PROD Affair"
By Event Horizon Ides of March Edition, 15 March 2008 Revision: 2 April 2008 00:01 HST
"It's always difficult to keep personal prejudice out of a thing like this. And wherever you run into it, prejudice always obscures the truth. I don't really know what the truth is. I don't suppose anybody will ever really know." Juror #8, Twelve Angry Men (1957)
The Leap Day weekend brought with it an extra day of buy and selling on eBay. It also ushered in an interesting event. A number of listings from Shopping.com, an eBay company, ended up on eBay.com. Counted in the hundreds of thousands these product listings were viewable on eBay.com, but not buyable.
This was an event that had ample room for opinions. Aside from the fact that the average eBay buyer could not buy these products, there was the question of did these listings affect the auction counts? An important question as eBay provides those listing counts in their many reports to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Opinions ranged from an eBay Forum poster describing the event as "Ebay is padding their listings", to Randy Smythe ofMy Blog Utopia!stating "this padding of listings is a non-starter."
All this would definitely pique the curiosity of anyone interested in eBay. For about 5 seconds. Because all the relevant data is spread across Google, or deleted, archived, horded, and just plain not in one place for quick perusal. End 5 seconds.
We're going to attempt to put a smidgen of all that happened in this article. And over time expand the article slightly to accommodate new found pieces.
Before we begin, changing the subject slightly, you're wondering why the style of the title sounds oddly familiar? We were inspired by eBay, with their one mini-smidgen contribution.
"Agent Sent Message", ebay Customer Service, 1 March 2008
Prologue. Internet transations are perishable and human memories short.
"people simply remember a version of events which makes as much sense as they require it to make" Douglas Adams, Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency (1987)
This article should not be considered a complete rendering of the Leap Day (2/29/2008) weekend events or a tome with all the available data. It is meant to give a relatively quick overview of the situation, and provide leads for those who wish to pursue more in depth study.
I. How many listings were involved?
"It was an accident" Captain James Kirk "You seem to have a lot of them." Captain John Christopher Star Trek, Tomorrow Is Yesterday (26 January 1967)
Do Listing Counts Matter?
Let's start with the simple matter of, does it matter at all? The answer is, Yes.
Listing counts are important to eBay, as the figures are reported to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
In the "Unaudited eBay Marketplaces Supplemental Operating Data" section is "Number of New Listings (2)" with the definition "(2) Listings on eBay Marketplaces trading platforms during the quarter, regardless of whether the listing subsequently closed successfully."
Listing counts are important to eBay, as they are mentioned in the report to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Reference the "29-Feb-2008" "Form 10-K for EBAY INC" "Annual Report".
In the "Key Operating Metrics and Financial Information" section (emphasis ours) eBay states , "Members of our senior management team regularly review key operating metrics such as active users, listings".
Further, "These financial measures allow us to monitor the profitability of our business and to evaluate the effectiveness of investments that we have made (and continue to make) in the areas of marketing, product development, international expansion, customer support and site operations. We believe that an understanding of these key operating and financial measures and how they change over time is important to investors, analysts and other parties analyzing our business results and future market opportunities."
In the "Financial Summary" section (emphasis ours) eBay states, "we face challenges in the U.S., U.K. and Germany, which are our three largest markets, as growth of listings, active users and GMV on the eBay.com platform in those countries has slowed."
In the "Results of Operations" section eBay has the metric "Number of listings (3)" with the definition of the metric being "(3) Listings on eBay Marketplaces trading platforms during the period, regardless of whether the listing subsequently closed successfully."
The fact that eBay has the subject of "listings" in their official reports, belies pundits claims that the listing counts are of no concern.
Those who proffer the specious argument that the amounts involved are small and therefore inconsequential, must not deal often in large real world real time computer systems. Let's propose the scenario that someone or some group accidentally dumps a quarter million to a half million database TEST records into a PRODUCTION system. This same person or group then tells people in authority nonsense such as 'it's 35 thousand Usher'.
This is what those people would hear in the real world:
"You're Fired!", Donald Trump
eBay's official position on the number of listings.
eBay - Listings erroneously placed on eBay.com: 35,000
"An eBay spokesman told PC Magazine at the time that 5,000 shopping.com listings were erroneously placed on ebay.com. After sellers expressed doubt about that number in the comments section, eBay was asked to again confirm that it was indeed 5,000. The same spokesman responded Friday that he had originally told PC Magazine that eBay pulled 35,000 listings, but a review of the interview confirmed that he said 5,000." PC Magazine, 10 March 2008
4 March 2008 - "5,000 shopping.com listings were erroneously placed on ebay.com"
7 March 2008 - "eBay pulled 35,000 listings"
10 March 200 - "a review of the interview confirmed that he said 5,000"
Usher Lieberman is eBay's Spokesman, and is not an integral part of eBay's programming departments. He reports to the press what he's told. In the matter of contradictory statements or "false and misleading statements to the press" [SEC], the original source of the "5,000" and "35,000" counts should be investigated.
Our research regarding the listing counts during the February 29th Leap Day weekend.
Total Listings, Hard Count:
161,358 to 192,966 (161,358 + 31,608) to 241,368 (161,358 + 80,000)
Total Listings, Soft Count:
271,280 to 302,888 (271,280 + 31,608) to 351,280 (271,280 + 80,000)
Estimated Listings Count: 500,000 (rounded)
Total Listings Hard Count Methodology.
The "Hard Count" represents the total number of auction listings confirmed by screen shots, archives, and reported by AuctionBytes. In theory the Hard Count should equal or be close to the Soft Count. But in practice it is not an easy task to collect hard evidence, from multiple witnesses, after the fact.
The 31,608 figure derives from the AuctionBytes observation that "indicated the seller had over 80,000 listings on eBay.com."
AuctionBytes does not reveal the identity of that seller. Making it possible that the seller with "80,000" items is part of the list of observed sellers. The 31,608 figure is derived from taking "80,000" and subtracting the largest listing count reported, which is 48,392. In this way listing counts are not added in twice.
In other words, if the seller with item count of "48,392" (part of the observed list of sellers) actually has "80,000" items, the total should be 161,358 + 31,608. The 31,608 being the uncounted part of the "80,000" (80,000 - 48,392). The 31,608 can increase to a maximum of 80,000, depending on who the seller is or is not.
For instance in the case of this seller not being on the reported list of 14 sellers, the soft count would be 161,358 plus 80,000 or 241,368.
There is also the case of the count from AuctionBytes being completely wrong; 0 items.
The Hard Count ranges from a minimum of 161,358 items, to a maximum of 241,368 items.
Total Listings Soft Count Methodology.
The "Soft Count" represents the total number of auction listings reported, but not necessarily verified by screen captures, etc.. The figure of 271,280 is the lower limit of those reported observations. As in the Hard Count, the 31,608 figure derives from the AuctionBytes observation that "indicated the seller had over 80,000 listings on eBay.com."
The observed Soft Count ranges from a minimum of 271,280 items, to a maximum of 351,280 items.
Estimated Listing Count Methodology.
Using the Medved "EBay Auction Counts: February 24, 2008 to March 1, 2008" chart, an estimate can be made as to the number of listings removed.
Logically we're looking for an increase and subsequent rapid decrease of at least 161,358 (Hard Count) listings and up to 351,280 (Soft Count), during the weekend time frame.
As it turns out there is just such an occurrence. There is an auction count spike in the auction count beginning at about the "2/29" (09:00 PM PST, Midnight EST) line and ending at about the "3/2" (09:00 PM PST, Midnight EST) line. From a graphing standpoint this increase conveniently begins after a relatively flat period of auction listings.
That would be approximately 13,900,000 (peak) - 13,400,000 (base) = 500,000 listings
13,393,000 28-FEB-2008 04:30 AM PST, 07:30 AM EST. Initial low point; base.
13,910,000 29-FEB-2008 10:00 AM PST, 01:00 PM EST. Peak
13,454,000 01-MAR-2008 07:00 PM PST, 10:00 PM EST. Lowest point of the day.
Using Randy Smythe's 13.5 million average daily auction listings as a measure, the half-a-million auction listings represents 3.7% of the daily total. A significant amount as far as the report by eBay's Accountants to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is concerned.
Is There More?
The question arises, were there more "test" listings. Our answer is, you are free to ponder this question.
But think about this. eBay held a listing special beginning on March 1st. Historically auction counts rise during a listing special. Typically a million or more. How many listings would have to be removed to not only negate the expected listing count increase, but cause the count to fall?
And ponder this too. As a matter of good business, eBay does put back listings removed in error. Such an increase due to putting back deleted listings would show up much later on Medved ("EBay Auction Counts: March 2, 2008 to March 8, 2008"). Abet buried in subsequent listing specials and promotions.
eBay's 2008 Q1 (1st Quarter, January 01 to March 31) report to the U.S. Security and Exchange Commission should be interesting.
II. SDC_PROD Seller List and Counts
"The world isn't run by weapons anymore, or energy, or money. It's run by little ones and zeroes, little bits of data. It's all just electrons." Cosmo, Sneakers (1992)
We believe that none of the Shopping.com sellers were aware their items were being transferred to eBay.com. As stipulated by eBay, "Shopping.com listings appeared accidentally on eBay.com". It would be an interesting exercise to find out if the involved Shopping.com sellers were billed eBay.com listing fees at the time, and then credited afterwards.
SDC_PROD Seller List
This is a list of the fourteen (14) "sdc_prod" (shopping dot com) seller accounts that were located and reported, 29 February to 1 March 2008. Plus additional sdc_prod sellers that were located post event.
This list contains:
A brief description of the seller.
A link to the seller's eBay.com Feedback page.
A link to the current number of items by the sdc_prod seller.
A link to search Google for the specific sellers.
That link can help you perform a search of the Google archives for sdc_prod related material. Use the "repeat the search with the omitted results included" option to maximize the available data.
On Google links to eBay.com or ebay.auction.co.kr use the "Cached" link to obtain the archived data.
Because this issue involves eBay.com, ignore eBay Express references.
And be quick because the Google archive cache data is dynamic; changing from day to day.
The "reported listing count" of items by sdc_prod name seller on eBay.com. As reported 29 February to 1 March 2008. And where available.
Links to screen captures of these auction counts. Where available.
The total count from the screen captures, 161,358, is evidence that eBay Spokesman Usher Lieberman made a number of "false and misleading statements to the press" when he said on multiple occasions that "5,000 listings" or "35,000 listings" were involved.
Time permitting, this section will be updated.
* sdc_prod_301013_74 Shopping.com seller The Twister Group Member since Oct-18-06 in Illinois, United States
"Never underestimate the power of human stupidity." Robert Heinlein, Time Enough For Love (1973)
There are two basic explanations.
eBay deliberately elevated auction counts, in effect producing "materially false and misleading statements" to improve their stock price. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission violation. A simple plan based on the simple but stupid premise that 'no one will find this.' Orange jumpsuits all around.
Human (Computer) Error. A cadre of programmers are allowed to run large scale tests on a live system. And goofed.
We had planned to explore and write about each possibility, but we'll leave that for another time.
IV. "THIS IS NOT AN EBAY LISTING"
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." George Santayana, The Life of Reason (1905)
Event Timeframe
Like many incidents, there are events that lead up to it, follow it, are associated with it, or simply happen in the same time frame.
Ebay Inc's (NASDAQ:EBAY) listing numbers have demonstrated dramatic volatility during the 'Vladuz' security scare. Some Ebay users have suggested that the millions of fraudulent listings are significantly inflating Ebay's listing numbers.
In response, an Ebay spokesperson claims: "there just isn't enough information there to tie the swings in listings that they show to any one cause". They declined to comment as to the number of accounts that may have been compromised.
It is also suggested that Medved's calculations for Ebay's total of listing numbers are overestimated too. As the Ebay spokesperson confirms, the Medved statistics used to quantify Ebay's listing numbers "far exceed our real activity in this area".
"The bug was related to the gallery feature that allows users to place a small photo of their item on the initial search returns page, a spokesman said. EBay traditionally charged 35 cents to include a gallery photo, but as part of the policy changes that went into effect February 20, they are now free of charge. However, "the code actually rolled out three hours late, so there were a certain number of listings ... that didn't get gallery free" Usher Lieberman eBay Spokesman to PC Magazine, 4 March 2008
It is unclear from the PC Magazine article, if the "bug" was implemented on February 20th, the day of the "policy changes", or on February 29th.
When I search ebay or via google for test listings I only find a few hundred yet total ebay listings are now running at or above Feb 12th numbers of 12.4 m (before 20 cent listings and boycott) so I fail to see the importance of test listings in inflating numbers.
28 February 2008 04:30 PM PST, 7:30 PM EST (Eastern Standard Time)
eBay Auction count at lowest point of the day; 13,393,000 items.
Coincidentally, or not, at about the time many of eBay's employees head for home, the auction count begins to rise. Did some programmer turn something on, and leave for the day, intending to check on the code's progress the following morning?
Auction count rises to 13,405,000 by 07:30 PST, 10:30 EST.
"eBay is running a marketing campaign to encourage buyers to shop on its site by offering them coupons. One buyer sent AuctionBytes a coupon he had received (pictured) that offered $5 toward shipping on any one item. Part of the terms and conditions follows:
This Offer is valid only when you pay with, and seller accepts, PayPal. This Offer is intended for the recipient whose eBay User ID is printed on the Offer and purchase must be made on eBay.com with that eBay User ID. This Offer is not transferable.
This Offer is for one-time use. It may only be redeemed on the total shipping cost of an item or items on one purchase from a single seller, using a single method of shipping and single currency, in a single transaction. This Offer expires February 28, 2008 at 11:59:59 PM (PST)." AuctionBytes, Wed Feb 27 2008 18:04:36
The above statement is in response to the earlier part of the thread:
ExcludeSellers Issue Posted: Jan 10, 2008 11:40 AM Is there a limit on the number of Excluded Sellers that can be specified in a GetSearchResults call? I have several excluded sellers that keep returning search results. I have checked the XML for the call, and it looks correct.
Also, is it a problem if entries are duplicated? (I will be correcting this in any event.)
Re: ExcludeSellers Issue Posted: Jan 10, 2008 12:12 PM After further research, it looks like there is a limit of 100 excluded sellers. Can this limit be raised? stsi.com
Re: ExcludeSellers Issue Feb 29, 2008 4:27 AM "Also, is it possible to use wildcards for excluded sellers? For example, I'd like to exclude the various iterations of sdc_prod_*, instead of having to type in all the numbers that this seller uses...." stsi.com
. 29 February 2008 10:00 AM PST, 01:00 PM Eastern Standard Time
Medved "EBay Auction Counts" reaches maximum for the day of approximately 13,900,000 items. The previous low count was 13,393,000 items on February 28th at 04:30 PM PST, 7:30 EST. An increase of about half-a-million listings in 16.5 hours.
Coincidentally, or not, during the time many of eBay's employees show up at work, the auction count abruptly stops rising.
One scenario:
07:00AM (10:00AM EST) - Programmers apply brakes to sdc_prod application.
08:30AM (11:30AM EST) - Or so they thought, sdc_prod application continues to add listings.
A case could be made that by 10AM eBay applied working corrective action on the sdc_prod listing problem. Because at this point the auction count drops.
. 29 February 2008 01:00 PM PST, 04:00 PM Eastern Standard Time
Medved "EBay Auction Counts" drops slightly approximately 13,875,000 items, from 13,900,000 items. Last count of the February 29th chart.
.
29 February 2008
Regarding the events of "Friday night" 29 February 2008.
eBay's statements:
1) "a "bug" in its system had accidentally placed listings from eBay-owned shopping.com onto eBay.com late Friday night." However, "the code actually rolled out three hours late, so there were a certain number of listings ... that didn't get gallery free, so we were going back and fixing that" on Friday, the spokesman said. "What happened was, when we wrote the code to implement that fix in the database table, there was a string that was left on there that populated and sent shopping.com listings onto ebay.com that it shouldn't have." Approximately 5,000 listings were pulled from shopping.com, but they have since been removed, according to eBay." PC Magazine, 4 March 2008
2) "eBay spokesperson Usher Lieberman initially told AuctionBytes they appeared due to a test, but on Monday, said he was incorrect and that the listings were the result of a glitch. On Tuesday, Lieberman explained the nature of the glitch. Programmers rolled out code on Friday evening that was meant to credit certain listings that were eligible for free Gallery. The credit was due to them because eBay had promised sellers Gallery would be free for listings started at a certain time of day, and the code had been rolled out 3 hours past the deadline. Lieberman said the programmers inadvertently caused the Shopping.com listings to appear on eBay.com when it created and launched the script to credit the sellers' accounts for Gallery fees. Lieberman said fewer than 35,000 listings were affected by the glitch." AuctionBytes, 5 March 2008
3) "An eBay spokesman told PC Magazine at the time that 5,000 shopping.com listings were erroneously placed on ebay.com. After sellers expressed doubt about that number in the comments section, eBay was asked to again confirm that it was indeed 5,000. The same spokesman responded Friday that he had originally told PC Magazine that eBay pulled 35,000 listings, but a review of the interview confirmed that he said 5,000." PC Magazine, 10 March 2008
4) "Editor's Note: The eBay spokesman confirmed Monday that the number of postings pulled from shopping.com was indeed 35,000." PC Magazine, 10 March 2008
. 29 February 2008 06:41 PM PST
First responders to Shopping.com listing anomaly.
By this time, the Medved "EBay Auction Counts" are somewhere between 13,875,000 listings (29 February 2008 01:00 PM PST) and 13,502,000 listings (1 March 2008 08:30 AM PST). "Between" as the Medved chart is blank between those times.
A possible scenario would be that eBay has been deleting listings since 10:00 AM; at least 8 hours. Or we should say an eBay application has been deleting sdc_prod listings.
eBay's March 1st Listing Special begins in 5 hours 19 minutes.
Sounds more like a conspiracy to me. 30 of these kinds of ID's with 35K listings is 1M items. Imagine the kind of volume drop you can hide with 30, 60 or 90 or whatever number of these IDs.
cmiprch (1732 ) Feb-29-08 21:19 PST 48 of 418
So "sdc" = shopping dot com?
Nice listings boost if eBay injected everything on shopping.com
I have been collecting all ebay's padded listings and forwarding them to the FTC so they will investigate them. Everything you can do will help.They should not get away with the crap they are doing.Im going to do my best to make sure they dont.
windorphin (31 ) Feb-29-08 21:40 PST 4 of 273
Don't waste your time. They aren't fake listings. They are your replacements. They're bringing in the big guns now. Huge retailers to compete with.
you would think they would at least use different user names. SDC_prod....I guess that is easier to keep up with. SDC = shopping dot com.....brilliant. haaaaa
I think the API developer angle is probably where the answer lies. Someone is clearly testing auction formats and listings, and these are not meant to be bid on.
.
29 February 2008 10:31:50 PM PST, 12:31:50 CST &1:31:50 AM 1 March EST
12:31:50 AM CST "I see. Actually, this is not an eBay listing, the problem is it's a Shopping.com listing that is showing on our site by mistake." Evan M. A., eBay Live Help Customer Service
12:32:25 AM CST It is a current issue, yes, we have a bug on it. These are meant to be on shopping.com only but due to some reason are showing on eBay as well and can't be bought through the site." Evan M. A., eBay Live Help Customer Service
.
29 February 2008 10:35 PM PST
eBay user comments, edited.
badmomster (Private) Feb-29-08 20:35 PST 68 of 521
It seems to me that if Ebay is boosting their numbers with bogus auctions, that's an issue for the SEC.
Just curious, exactly what FTC code violation are you reporting them for?
And the SEC? It's an auction listing, not stock manipulation.
Going crazy will not help your cause.
aenthal (2243 ) Feb-29-08 23:04 PST 34 of 273
These bogus auctions are not a violation of anything. EBay has a right to put anything they wish on their web servers, and they apparently wish to use space up with displays of auctions that don't exist.
"He said he had made a mistake when he called the Shopping.com listings a test on Saturday morning. He was trying to track it down and after talking to a few people, felt comfortable saying it was a test, and subsequently found out the listings had appeared accidentally. Usher said it was his fault for initially getting it wrong." Ina Steiner, AuctionBytes, 4 March 2008 04:02:46 AM PST
AuctionBytes does not report this fact, "80,000 listings," for 4 days.
.
1 March 2008 12:00:01 AM PST, 3:00:01 AM Easter Standard Time
eBay listing upgrade special, "2 days only March 1-2", begins. eBay sellers can list products at reduced prices. Historically the auction counts rise significantly during these eBay specials.
There is no 12:00:01 AM count per sec, as there is a gap in the record from 01:00 PM PST (04:00 PM EST) February 29th to 08:30 AM PST (11:30 AM EST) March 1st.
Here is a copy of the list again for those that missed it. sdc_prod_434012 # of listings 35002 sdc_prod_9124_14 # of listings 48395 sdc_prod_9074_35 # of listings 21401 sdc_prod_9452 # of listings 24501 sdc_prod_301013_74 # of listings 27291 sdc_prod_9352_67 # of listings 30278 sdc_ prod_ 9055 # of listings 1925 sdc_prod_9021_2 # of listings 12233 sdc_prod_9391_43 #oflistings 11100
moopy_inc (5562 ) Mar-01-08 00:17 PST 459 of 786
well, we all saw it, others on powersellersunite.com has seen it. I just wish these were found during the day. So many more people could have seen them.
O.K. they are right back at it. I was double checking the Ids and these 4 have auctions listed again. Take a look. sdc_prod_301013_74 sdc_prod_310426 sdc_prod_9352_67 sdc_prod_9452
"Mystery listings are appearing on eBay that don't allow shoppers to bid or buy. The listings appear to be feeds from Shopping.com sellers. A look at the User ID sdc_prod_301013_74, for example, shows the seller has 27,076 listings - but the ones we clicked on did not have bid or buy buttons."
Considering eBay does not report figures, it seems kinda like the conspiracies are rampant again. Because 3rd parties out there attempt to circumvent and create programs to provide folks this, it is just not logical for eBay to gain anything from this.
I agree with thizzwear completely on this. And Thizz, does not matter what date they were doing this testing, all the chicken littles will make that date fit into the agenda which they have. There is no winning for eBay for anything they do, the Chicken Littles of the world will use their twisted logic to make it appear they did this for some adverse reasoning.
The more these chicken littles talk, the less eductated they look. It has really become a joke to read all these things that are being said now.
"I'm betting Murphys Law is driving this event rather than any evil empire."
"For me this isn't a significant issue in isolation but there is a potentially more worrying aspect to this story. Many readers will share the belief of many that eBay has never been good at introducing new or changed code leading many users to feel like Beta testers all too often. With the amount of changes planned for the coming months I have a hunch today is just one of a string of "cock ups" we will be reading and reporting in the near future."
I don't believe ebay has done anything with the intent to manipulate or deceive. The point is that IF whatever sort of glitch this is has mistakenly over inflated the numbers, then eBay is responsible for making the shareholders aware of the accounting errors IF the mistake has an impact on the stock values and/or IF the errors impact the financial reports to the shareholders. I don't know about the whole casino scenario you've got going, I was thinking more along the lines of Enron and such.
eBay cannot be held accountable for any errors if they can say that they didn't know, which is why someone must have proof that an officer of eBay or PREFERABLY THE GENERAL COUNSEL FOR EBAY has been made aware of the possibility of a considerable accounting error in the financial reports to the shareholders.
shwp1 (1919 ) Mar-01-08 07:03 PST 681 of 878
I asked this earlier and it's still nagging at me.
Someone...[forgive me but I have forgotten who], posted a link to another forum where one of the sdc###### was inquiring how many id's they could have... The were told 100....how many did they need? sdc###### responded 400 or 500
soooooooooo
If sdc= shoppingdotcom and shoppingdotcom is owned by Ebay
Isn't that like asking yourself a question...and doing it where everyone can hear [read] you ask?
the*katy*workshop (1468 ) Mar-01-08 07:11 PST 683 of 878
27076 items found (Save this search) Show only: Items from seller sdc_prod_301013_74
The absolute ONLY way for these items to show "by accident" is if the eBay techs included them in the database. If this was done "on accident" then those tech should absolutely be fired, because they are mixing two different databases and that is potentially a MAJOR screwup.
It seems that they probably have done this on purpose, because it's highly unlikely that the two different databases share the same table titles and attributes. Meaning that the SDC listings would have had to have been converted to fit the eBay database before they would show up, otherwise they would just error out and potentially bring down the whole eBay database.
Something is not right with this...you cannot just have stuff appear "on accident"...not when you're dealing with databases.
19808 items found (Save this search) Show only: Items from seller sdc_prod_9452
.
1 March 2008 08:10 AM PST, 16:10 GMT
200k Shopping.com items appear on eBay TameBay Author: Chris Dawson Posted at: Saturday, March 1st, 2008 at 4:10 pm Tags for this post: eBay.com, shopping.com, Snafu
Excerpt:
"User names such as sdc_prod_9124_14 with some 48,000 eBay listings appeared, although currently all the listings appear to have been removed. SDC is the acronym for shopping.com, the shopping comparison site owned by eBay.
sdc_prod_9124_14 The listings had no bid/bin links, simply a link to add to watched items leading so speculation that eBay are using them to increase listing numbers. A more rational explanation is that some one made an error in launching Shopping.com listings onto eBay and the error was swiftly reversed."
Just like they were nailed cold with the "shipping stars" snafu, they are nailed cold with this one. Of course they will announce it was a simple mistake, and get rid of the fake listings.
.
1 March 2008 08:30 AM PST, 11:30 AM EST
Medved "EBay Auction Counts" approximately 13,502,000 items. The auction count was previously 13,875,000 listings (29 February 2008 01:00 PM PST)
Eight and a half hours into eBay's listing upgrade special, "2 days only March 1-2", and the auction count is falling.
I read an article recently that Ebay (who owns Shopping) was going to start having some of the Shopping feeds shown on Ebay. That was one of the reasons I signed up for Shopping but then found that all my Amazon listings were already on Shopping. So no point in competing with my self and using my own money to be seen on Shopping when Amazon pays and does it for me.
Chris, it’s likely that it was a slip-up. There have been discussions about integrating SDC listings into to eBay for awhile. These listings would not have shown up on eBay.com in the form that they did if eBay hadn’t set them up this way. So I would say it was a slip-up before a test. Eventually we will see SDC listing on the main platform.
I agee with you that it wasn’t eBay trying to inflate listing numbers.
I don't know if it's a glitch, hack or purposeful deception. However, what makes it curious is all the auctions I looked at started last Thursday the day after the listing sale ended.
I must have missed that one. These are the ones I found, with last night's and this morning's results shown. That list you have only shows 10,000 counts ... could have been much more than that:
ID found:...............first shot..... Now sdc_prod_9452...........19808....still there sdc_prod_30103_74....27076....still there sdc_prod_9055............1925.....zero now sdc_prod_442675_57...4702.....zero now sdc_prod_9124_14.......42578...zero now sdc_prod_9090............ 24501...zero now sdc_prod_434012..........35000...zero now
. 1 March 2008 01:02 PM PST, 03:02 PM CST
eBay Customer Service Agent (Lanie R.) and an eBay customer: 15:02 Agent Sent Message: I'm sorry for the inconvenience.This is actually an issue on the site right now I'm afraid. This is actually a Shopping.com listing that's appearing incorrectly on eBay. 15:03 Agent Sent Message: Our Technical team is working on getting resolved though, and I had this reported for you so we can add your account to the list. 15:03 Customer: Do these incorrect listings show up in ebays total listings/ Wouldn't they scew the listings totals? 15:04 Agent Sent Message: Oh, no it shouldn't though. 15:05 Agent Sent Message: The team is checking on the accounts of the sellers you reported as well for further investigation. 15:05 Customer: Shoudn't or absolutely doesn't? 15:05 Agent Sent Message: Absolutely doesn't.This is only a glitch on the search pages. 15:06 Agent Sent Message: You can check it from time to time to see it not on the eBay pages, only on Shopping.com 15:06 Customer: can you explain that a little further? 15:08 Customer: I'm not familiar with shopping.com. Why would their listings show up on ebay. Anf the one I mentionaed has ebay seller feedback. 15:08 Agent Sent Message: Sure! In the eBay account of the seller for items sold at eBay, it shouldn't get reflected, but if you were referring to the "items from seller" link for all items he is selling, I'm afraid the Shopping.com items will also appear and is confirmed as a tec 15:08 Agent Sent Message: hnical glitch. 15:09 Customer: can you respond to my last question also? 15:09 Agent Sent Message: Sorry for the confusion, Shopping.com is a specialty site owned by eBay but we handle separate accounts. It's similar to Express or Half.com 3/1/2008 15:10 Agent Sent Message: Ah, okay, Here's what happens, this particular seller has an account with SHopping.com to sell items, which is a different one as an eBay seller.
Cyoung 67- Another poster and I caught that auction in the act last night. OP did a “snapshot” when it was at 35,000 listings and sent it to ABC NEWS. I was watching it around the same time and the listings went from 37,000 at the first point. I checked in on it 4 more times, 2nd time I think it was 17,000 auctions, then 7,000 and then 5,000 and finally in went to 536. Now it is at zero. OP and I both posted our findings but cannot find it this morning. Surprise, Surprise!
Would it not stand to reason, that if some deal was worked out, with say Shopping.com and premier members that pay to Shopping.com get free exposure listings with eBay, that in fact it is not costing them anything to have these listed in an eBay store account? That would make sense. . I do not profess to know what arrangement that Shopping.com merchants have, but it seems I read something to that effect somewhere.
Well on Monday the Expanded Seller Protection enrollment link showed up for a period of time before getting removed.
Maybe this was some sort of a test like that where it went "live" and then was taken down.
On one hand I would think if it were a test, they would have used a much smaller amount of listings so it wasn't so visible and on the other hand maybe they wanted to see how large a volume they could handle for sellers as a means of luring users back from amazon or not lose them to amazon.
And then also maybe they wanted to see what current, knowledgeable users would say about the listings to quickly find out what "goofs" there were.
"Today the Blogs and eBay Finance forums and eBay Seller forums are buzzing with examples of mysterious listings of items on which you cannot bid or which you cannot buy. These number in tens of thousands on seller accounts that were located today."
sdc_prod_301013_74 has been a member since Oct-18-06.
If you view the Text-format only page for their listings, it's very interesting. I am viewing it with 200 items per page. - there are 27076 items found (but only 10000 can be viewed in the Text-format list) - The first page of listings were started Jun-04-07 and ended on Nov-01-07 (why are they still listed in Text-format only? The item #s are invalid.) - On the 15th page of listings, approx. half were started Apr-19-07 and ended Nov-15-07 16:19:44 PST. That's approx. 2900 listings that ended before Nov-15-07, and should no longer be on the site. - All the rest of the listings (approx 7100) were started on Feb-25-08 and will end Mar-26-08, between 14:22:26 PDT and 14:32:16 PDT. They are 30 day listings.
There's been a lot of this going on this past month. Thousands of listings within weeks or even days and about 20% FB, if any. Odd times.
username: sdc_prod_301013_74 has 27291 listings. username: sdc_prod_9090 has 32601 listings. username: sdc_prod_9352_67 has 30278 listings. username: sdc_prod_9074_35 has 21481 listings
You want them to let you know every time they do tests? You think other sites let you know when they do test? You're dreaming!
sojo2004 (2698 ) Mar-01-08 18:23 PST 78 of 333
OK, this is what ebay says about test auctions:
Guidelines for Test Listings
Listings in the Test Auction category must be clearly labeled as a ’test’, both in the listing title and description. No more than 10 test listings should run at once by a single account. Accounts that leave or receive feedback in the Test Auction category must be used for test purposes only. This means that members must use a different account to leave or receive feedback for test purposes than is used for buy or sell on the site. Accounts found to be in violation of this guideline will be subject to immediate suspension.
Any Feedback left on test listings should be clearly labeled ‘test’.
All ’test’ feedback is subject to removal at any time, at eBay's discretion.
Normal listing fees will be charged when listing in the test category.
But I guess that just applies to members, not the management.
But in answer to pepin -- yes, if we have to clearly state a test listing is a test listing, then I DO think ebay should have to do the same.
sojo
Things are going swimmingly, thank you for asking.
. 1 March 2008 07:00 PM PST, 10:00 PM EST (Eastern Standard Time)
Medved "EBay Auction Counts" approximately 13,455,000 items. Auction count at the lowest point of the day.
Comments please? Just saw this at the very tail end of a thread in the Feedback Forum. Thought it was appropriate to mention here. (They had a different item number from this seller posted, but I'm not sure I can do that.)
No price, no way to bid on it (I tried $30 just to see what would happen - it said transaction blocked, cannot bid on this kind of item) and if you click on see sellers other listings he has 35K+ others. And it's a zero account. Location - CA. Website in auction too.
How the heck would you even list something up with no way to bid on it? This is either just leading to their website and bigtime circumvention or it's eBay themselves inflating the numbers. Interesting either way.
What do the experts think?
. 1 March 2008 08:30 PM PST, 11:30 PM Eastern Standard Time
Medved "EBay Auction Counts" approximately 13,460,000 items. Last count of the March 1st chart.
Note auction count spike beginning at the "2/29" (09:00 PM PST, Midnight EST) line and ending at the "3/2" (09:00 PM PST, Midnight EST) line.
Yesterday, I tried to bid on one of the SDC listings. And, this was not an eBay Express listing. It was one of the active auction format listings. And, the page would not accept my bid.
I put the item in my watched items, and it's still there. But now, when I click the item, the auction has been pulled. And when I search those listings for that seller, they are showing no auctions- so all 27K of the auction format listings have been pulled.
.
2 March 2008 08:26:53 AM PST
Comment, edited.
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 08:26:53 -0800 (PST)
The evidence is consistent with that conclusion, but is not yet proof of that. This could yet be hacking, or API/server malfunction. It could also be an unannounced "test" that accidentally had the "unintended" side effect of inflating traffic, right, sure.
In any event, there clearly are "fake Ebay listings", and in large numbers. Large enough to materially affect traffic count? I suspect we'll know in a few days.
The interesting thing to watch here is whether or not this phenomenon continues, and if it stops, what happens to the traffic reports. -- Regards, Bob Niland
Let's revamp this weekends events. 1. at 18:41 pst Friday evening a thread was started about listings that could not be bid on or bought. 2. between 12 am pst and 3 am Saturday these listings were being pulled. 3. These so called TEST listings if they were only TEST listings would have no reason to be pulled and some of the sdc_prod_### id's narued. 4. Then the thread of these findings is removed along with any that mention it. 5. why please tell me why, if this was only a TEST has it become an issue to remove them and the threads discussing them.
markd13 (84 ) Mar-02-08 11:19 PST 38 of 432
I see the Conspiracy Nut Jobs are out in full force.
And then we have the Free Speech nut jobs who have never read the Constitution or Bill of Rights and yammer on about something they have no knowledge. They don't seem to understand it doesn't cover entities like eBay.
But then again when have facts every stopped a nut job from their ranting.
.
2 March 2008 02:31 PM PST, 05:31 PM Easter Standard Time
"if they were using these thousands of test listings to skewer 3rd party listing stats generators like,Medved Charts and PowerSellersUnite.com it is outright fraud!"
.
2 March 2008 02:32 PM PST
eBay System Status Announcement Board ***Resolved: Shopping.com listings on eBay*** "Some Shopping.com listings appeared accidentally on eBay.com over the past two days. This system issue has been resolved. We apologize for any confusion or inconvenience this may have caused."
That was ebays pathetic excuse for 400,000 listings that all appeared out of nowhere and then disappeared almost as quick and looked nothing like any other ebay listings and if thats the case...then ebay is a very unsafe place to shop! How in the hell do 400,000 listings "accidentally" appear? That means that your private information on this site is no longer safe if stuff from any other site can just somehow magically appear on this one!
magisterrex (6944 ) Mar-02-08 15:54 PST 170 of 418
I don't know why so many people are quick to ASSume that eBay is an evil corporate entity that wants to steal their souls and use them as currency whilst dealing with the Devil.
When I last checked, you were supposed to be INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty. From the bizarre, over-the-top posts on this thread, I have no idea why some of you even sell here.
I know that if I felt that strongly about eBay, I would do what Bruce is doing, and exit, stage left.
"If the hundreds of thousands listings you cannot Buy Now or Bid on on eBay site are just an innocent mistake / glitch or have a legitimate reason to be there, why would eBay moderators be so diligent in removing posts from their forums discussing these? Although the eBay forum thread has been removed by eBay Moderators, Google cache still has some of the posts"
By the way, at the moment, I don't believe eBay did this on purpose to inflate listings. While it's a possibility, I would hope eBay's not that stupid. I really can't see it happening as there are just too many people who would have to have been involved to do that.
in-weave (7349 ) Mar-02-08 16:56 PST 197 of 418
Some Shopping.com listings appeared accidentally on eBay.com over the past two days. This system issue has been resolved. We apologize for any confusion or inconvenience this may have caused.
I don't think we've seen the end of this....and, in some ways, I don't want to know what carp is coming. There's a reason they "accidentally" appeared. eBay may not have wanted anyone to notice them so that may be the accident but I'll be very surpised if we don't see something relating to shopping.com listings/eBay by the middle of the summer.
. 2 March 2008 8:30 PM PST, 11:30 PM Eastern Standard Time
Medved "EBay Auction Counts" approximately 13,330,000 items. Last count of the March 2nd chart.
Why don't you start your own auction site posseauctions.com and make it perfect ...
I.E. the first website ever that has no glitches, and we'll all use it! Be sure to make a possee discussion board too!!
Remember it has to be perfect just like you, and never have any issues/glitches at all, even if millions of people are all using it at once.
Especially be sure to make a perfect message board! So we won't run the risk of not getting your daily/hourly/minutely/secondly words of possee wisdom!
Let us know when its ready possee!
.
2 March 2008 11:59 PM PST, 2:59 AM 3 March Eastern Standard Time
According to the Medved "EBay Auction Counts", at the time the listing special ended the count was approximately 13,355,000 items. The count at the start of the listing special was about 13,502,000 listings. An overall decrease.
Regarding the events and comments of Monday March 3rd.
"I spoke to eBay's Usher Lieberman during the IMA conference on Monday. He said he had made a mistake when he called the Shopping.com listings a test on Saturday morning. He was trying to track it down and after talking to a few people, felt comfortable saying it was a test, and subsequently found out the listings had appeared accidentally. Usher said it was his fault for initially getting it wrong." Ina Steiner, AutionBytes, 4 March 2008 04:02:46
"they apparently choose to take this action in an effort to reduce the visibiltiy of the test or accident, whichever it was.........eBay needs to get their stories STRAIGHT!
My Opinion If it really was a test, eBay should have announced it before they ran it, on the system announcement board. This was no accident. eBay rarely does anything by accident, but if they do, it is corrected very quickly, not 2 or more days later."
lol we wanted ebay to acknowledge the glitches so we would know about them and wouldn't run around trying to find out if there was something we were doing wrong. Now people are using the notifications to complain that there are glitches?
"In fact we recently saw Shopping.com listings on the eBay.com site, which gives you an idea of their plans. eBay's response to the SDC listings was; "Some Shopping.com listings appeared accidentally on eBay.com over the past two days. This system issue has been resolved. We apologize for any confusion or inconvenience this may have caused." Notice it wasn't an error, it was accidental. Believe me, the accidental part was, that they showed up now, before they were supposed to. I have a hunch we will see SDC listings on the eBay platform sooner rather than later; first as a test and if that goes over well, they will roll them out site wide."
It now has been about a week that the PAID BASHERS community has been busy polluting our beloved board with sorry comments about how eBay has floated or artifically increased its listing. Maybe one day these PAID BASHERS who are PAID money to spread lies and misinformation can discuss the matter with their boss and get an answer for us all. Question: How can you accuse eBay ...
I spoke to eBay's Usher Lieberman during the IMA conference on Monday. He said he had made a mistake when he called the Shopping.com listings a test on Saturday morning. He was trying to track it down and after talking to a few people, felt comfortable saying it was a test, and subsequently found out the listings had appeared accidentally. Usher said it was his fault for initially getting it wrong.
I asked Usher if he could tell me more, and he could not. I asked him if we might expect to see Shopping.com listings on eBay in the future, or eBay.com listings on Shopping. He said eBay is looking at a lot of different things and can't speculate on anything.
"Lots of things are on the table," he said.
. 4 March 2008 04:02 AM PST
Regarding events and comments taking place on Tuesday March 4th.
"On Tuesday, Lieberman explained the nature of the glitch. Programmers rolled out code on Friday evening that was meant to credit certain listings that were eligible for free Gallery. The credit was due to them because eBay had promised sellers Gallery would be free for listings started at a certain time of day, and the code had been rolled out 3 hours past the deadline." AuctionBytes, 5 March 2008
"When the bug first emerged on Friday, the spokesman told a reporter that it was actually a planned test. "But it wasn't a test. It ended up being a bug," he said. "So I ate a little bit of crow on that.""
"EBay denied that any forum deletions were intentional. If any posts were taken down "it was accidental," the spokesman said. "We're not afraid of hearing from our community and allowing them to post and discuss things and be angry on our boards.""
It is quite possible that the messy matter is approaching a large fan
Approximately 5,000 listings were pulled from shopping.com, but they have since been removed, according to eBay. (from the PCMAG article)
That is so far from reality that it is ludicrous -- Not only ludicrous but so easily shot through of holes that it borders on management malpractice -- and when it is shown to be GROSSLY understated will invite ever more scrutiny --
We may be seeing a company beginning to circle the wagons and the result will be downright ugly --
If only companies that make major goofs would read the Johnson and Johnson Tylenol Story -- It is a roadmap to not just successful damage control but also to public trust --
Although public trust is at risk -- eBAY is taking an even larger risk with shareholder trust -- A trust that if lost will lead to the dissolution of the company -- an extreme that is unlikely to be sure -- but a needless exposure non the less
Continued pressure here would be far more effective than any boycott in bending managements will -- This misstep is an opportunity that the dissenters will be foolish to waste
I would start by looking for deleted in threads on the net and follow with screen shots of them and the 5000 listings -- followed by 5000 more a day later -- and on and on --
There are now at least two main stream media giants with interest -- an opportunity that is priceless
The eBay owned Korean website often mirrors ebay.com auctions. Many of these sdc_prod_ listings are still live on their website. If you want to find them, go to Goog and enter the specific sdc_prod_ number, leave a space, and then enter site:ebay.auction.co.kr
When the results are shown, click on "repeat the search with the omitted results included."
You can find the sdc numbers on various websites/blogs. The eBay Korean website only shows the listings that are currently active and not the ones that have scrolled off but there are still quite a few.
.
5 March 2008
Regarding the events and comments of Wednesday March 5th.
AuctionBytes releases the "80,000" figure to eBay and the public. They first observed this figure on March 1st. Four days earlier.
"However, he had no explanation for the fact that when AuctionBytes looked at one Shopping.com selling account on Saturday morning, it indicated the seller had over 80,000 listings on eBay.com." AuctionBytes, 5 March 2008
AuctionBytes becomes the first large news organization to report a count from direct observation of the situation. However AuctionBytes has not substantiated their claim with screen shots.
"Of the accusations of listing count manipulation, Lieberman said, "To think that we'd do that now is outrageous."" AuctionBytes, 5 March 2008
"When Shopping.com listings appeared on eBay.com last week, sellers pointed to it as an example of eBay attempting to boost listing numbers."
"AuctionBytes previously reported that several discussion threads had been removed, including one linked to in the original blog post published on Saturday.
Most sellers are likely taking little notice of the dust-up. Those who are suspicious may be unlikely to be satisfied with eBay's response."
Approximately 5,000 listings were pulled from shopping.com, but they have since been removed, according to eBay.
From the AB article
Lieberman said the programmers inadvertently caused the Shopping.com listings to appear on eBay.com when it created and launched the script to credit the sellers' accounts for Gallery fees.
Lieberman said fewer than 35,000 listings were affected by the glitch.
I am going to start a lottery methinks --
Whoever gets closest to the next eBAY estimated number of misplaced SDC listings will receive --
An all expense day trip to Leavenworth with full visitors passes and change for the vending machines -- While there they can visit the eBAY Exec of their choice
If both "buy" the explainations will likely go no where.
Should the SEC investigate there will be no buying of stories -- IMO
They are probably one of the scariest Regulatory bodies that Wall Street deals with -- They have teeth and are not at all shy about biting -- They are also pretty straight forward and fair without leaning in any particulat direction to meet an agenda
My attorney and accountant are also preparing letters to be sent to the State Attorney General requesting a watch on the situation with some of the "facts" that have surfaced attached as an addendum -- In that the Street is located here many a firm has been put in the hot seat through that AG Office even though technically domocilled elsewhere.
I am still jumping to no conclusions -- BUT -- The more the story changes the antsier I become --
jake-deals-4u (700 ) Mar-05-08 08:16 PST 213 of 333
preparing letters to be sent to the State Attorney General requesting a watch on the situation with some of the "facts
Too bad im sure the facts are' Everybody uses eBay at their OWN RISK via a user agreemant that is NOT compulsory, its voluntary.
And im sure theres probably an 12th grade HS kid that could explain that its eBays business & they can do as they dang well please with their OWN SITE + if someone doesnt like it, they are FREE to leave!
OTOH i havent quite figured out why someone who is a stockholder ( at their own FREE WILL & PROFIT ) would bad-mouth & spread bad-will at a company that they have a personal financial stake in , far & above the average site user.
If i was so upset at a company that i held stock in, i would sell that stock ASAP reguardless of P/L
pepins4b8e (21 ) Mar-05-08 08:41 PST 217 of 426
Carl, I own stock myself (although I'm sure not to your big wig level ). I fail to get a wedgie about this because while I see the listing numbers as an indicator, it is of small importance to me compared to the quarter-end results.
I guess we'll see if shareholders tend to think like me, or like you on this. I'm not criticizing your position. I just think that the press much prefers to follow Scarlett Johansson selling an evening with her on eBay versus some nebulous conspiracy about the number of listings on eBay.
La huelga de eBay ha sido más que un éxito. No fue sólo una caída del 13% de los artículos listados. Como sospechábamos eBay ha estado inflando artificialmente el número de artículos listados por 2 razones:
1) Para que los huelguistas nos desanimáramos haciéndonos creer que nuestra huelga era una huelga que llevábamos a cabo sólo unos cuantos vendedores.
2) PAra engañar a la bolsa.
La noticia acaba de salir en la propia CNN de EE.UU. Si se confirma la estafa en bolsa por parte de eBay estaría violando una Ley Federal muy seria y la multa que les caerá será de espanto, con el añadido de la mala reputación internacional que se producirá en el mercado financiero mundial de esta empresa y efectivo negativo en sus acciones.
Como véis, compañeros, cuando planatamos cojones y ovarios unidos, incluso podemos enfrentarnos contra las multinacionales y pisarles el cuello como ellos nos lo pisan a nosotros. Mis felicitaciones a todos los currantes vendedores de eBay y la solidaridad y apoyo de muchísimos compradores. Lo estamos consiguiendo. Van a venir más huelgas. Y vamos a seguir dándoles caña hasta que nos quiten el pie del cuello. Si tratan de hundirnos se hundirán ellos con nosotros.
"But could there be something a little more sinister taking place on the site? Rumors are definitely swirling that the site has actually been padding its numbers with fake item listings. eBay wouldn't dare do such a thing, would it? It has already admitted that a "bug" in the system did in fact insert some fake listings into the site's database. The question is, was this really a bug, or did the site knowingly inflate its listings?"
Why don't they do it on there stupid playgroud thing they set up?
ALL companies I know of have a test bed server to try out new things. They don't want to risk problems on the servers that make them money or are mission critical.
I spent 23 1/2 years with HP working with high end servers before retiring so I'm absolutely certain that a company would not risk problems running tests on a live system.
In my opinion, eBay is padding their listings.
vik*nan (33 ) Mar-05-08 23:25 PST 48 of 70
ALL companies I know of have a test bed server to try out new things.
a "sandbox" --- system or network to try out new software and equipment before deploying them to the production network.
Tests are never made on a production network even in smaller companies
aenthal (2241 ) Mar-05-08 23:59 PST 54 of 70
I don't care if eBay pads their listings. What will it get them? A larger count on their server? And what will that get them? More space used up on their server. And what will that get them? Nothing. Fake auctions don't bring in money, even if you put up a million of them.
I tend to agree that this is technical phenomenon, not a Pinocchio problem. But yes, they also have a Pinocchio problem, and an ostrich problem, and a robot problem (se habla Fortran because there are no humans behind that curtain, working the strings).
Let them tell all the Pinocchio versions of reality that they want. You can't turn a delusion into reality, no matter how many times you repeat it, no matter how much fake evidence you create to support it. Sometimes karma is sleeping. But in eBay's case it is hungry, and it will bite them in the butt eventually.
But don't worry about how they expose that butt before karma gets them. Just be glad that it eventually will.
windorphin (31 ) Mar-06-08 06:15 PST 61 of 70
They use the numbers to show their stockholders that listings are not decreasing. Therefore they are lying and manipulating stock prices.
The analogy drawn about a restaurant filling their seats with mannequins with stockholders driving past is a good one. It is just as meaningless, and nobody will get in trouble for it.
It would only be a violation if they somehow cooked the books to show that those mannequins had eaten and paid.
Current Registrar: NETWORK SOLUTIONS, LLC. IP Address: 66.135.194.100 (ARIN & RIPE IP search)
shopping.com's provider is pnap.net
NS2ANY.SHOPPING.COM NS1ANY.SHOPPING.COM
Current Registrar: MARKMONITOR INC. IP Address: 64.94.186.80 (ARIN & RIPE IP search)
uplatewhattodo (18 ) Mar-06-08 21:18 PST 11 of 31
AS a techie myself, I do have to disagree with this analysis a bit. Everything about DNS and IP's etc has to do with how eBay and shopping.com provide the informaton out to the world. It says nothing as to how that information is stored in the database or databases. If they are sharing databases distributed across their internal networks, or even storage arrays are being shared by the two systems then it's possible.
They did say they were running a script that caused it which means they were running data directly into the database system(s) and bypassing all the interfaces.
A very bad idea to mess with a database that way if you don't know what you are doing, but it does make it possible. And it would violate Sarbanes Oxley if they didn't cross their t's and dot their i's, which they apparently did not do.
.
6 March 2008
Despite eBay's announcement of March 2nd, that "system issue has been resolved", 'accidental' auction listings can still be found.
think the whole thing was filed under rumors speculations
these links that ur bringin here they are written by a bunch of nobodies ur credibility is in the drink, u believe everything u read, u realy expect us to believe this junk i think what's goin on here is worse than what is goin on at ebay. too bad too a shame this forum is wrecked
"I complain about eBay as much as the next guy and they certainly need to revamp their whole PR department and communicate better with sellers but this padding of listings is a non-starter."
"An eBay spokesman told PC Magazine at the time that 5,000 shopping.com listings were erroneously placed on ebay.com."
"eBay was asked to again confirm that it was indeed 5,000." "The same spokesman responded Friday that he had originally told PC Magazine that eBay pulled 35,000 listings"
"a review of the interview confirmed that he said 5,000."
"Editor's Note: The eBay spokesman confirmed Monday that the number of postings pulled from shopping.com was indeed 35,000."
The eBay computer engineers do give us software which has glitches and bugs, so I can see someone making a colossal error. But technically, can this error even be caused?
"Lieberman said the programmers inadvertently caused the Shopping.com listings to appear on eBay.com when it created and launched the script to credit the sellers' accounts for Gallery fees."
It sounds as though they would be working with accounting software, not launching listings. Very bizarre.
"Die Stellungnahmen der amerikanischen eBay-Sprecher trugen auch nicht unbedingt zur Erhellung bei. In sich widersprechenden Statements war von Tests, Versehen oder Irrtümern die Rede. Ähnlich verwirrende Auskünfte gab es auch für Kunden, die sich bei „Live-Help“ direkt informieren wollten."
"Last weekend, first rumours, then facts, emerged regarding the mass insertion of listings with no bid or buy-now button, which many speculated were deliberately added to mask the effects of the seller boycott. Throughout the bloggosphere, bloggers dependant on eBay for their content, and ad-click revenues, gave San Jose the benefit of the doubt. Ina Steiner of AuctionBytes even interviewed a senior eBay bod, and both Randy Smythe and eBay UK’s tame bay gave reasons why it had to be a glitch or site test, rather than something from the dirty tricks department. First eBay spokesman Usher Leiberman said it was a test, then said it wasn’t, and then declined to comment further. Posts appeared on eBay announcement boards, and have been all over forums on both sides of the Atlantic."
.
10 March 2008
Despite eBay's announcement of March 2nd that "system issue has been resolved", 'accidental' auction listings can still be found.
Trotz der Ankündigungen seitens vieler US-Verkäufer, während des Streiks vom 18. bis 25. Februar keine Angebote zu listen sind die Angebotszahlen bei ebay.com im fraglichen Zeitraum fast nicht gesunken.
Eine genauere Erklärung dafür findet sich natürlich nicht im ebay-Forum sondern extern.
A: We've altered the title to avoid being labeled as SPAM. Apparently Google considers variations of "sdc_prod" and "Shopping.com" to be SPAM, and removes direct links to such articles and items. Apparently late last year eBay began flooding Google with Shopping.com and sdc_prod* "advertising". Google's standard reaction to advertising SPAM is death by link removal.
// // //
The right to publish this news article - U.S. Supreme Court - 1988
At the heart of the First Amendment is the recognition of the fundamental importance of the free flow of ideas and opinions on matters of public interest and concern. "[T]he [485 U.S. 46, 51] freedom to speak one's mind is not only an aspect of individual liberty - and thus a good unto itself - but also is essential to the common quest for truth and the vitality of society as a whole." Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc., 466 U.S. 485, 503 -504 (1984). We have therefore been particularly vigilant to ensure that individual expressions of ideas remain free from governmentally imposed sanctions. The First Amendment recognizes no such thing as a "false" idea. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323, 339 (1974). As Justice Holmes wrote, "when men have realized that time has upset many fighting faiths, they may come to believe even more than they believe the very foundations of their own conduct that the ultimate good desired is better reached by free trade in ideas - that the best test of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market . . . ." Abrams v. United States, 250 U.S. 616, 630 (1919) (dissenting opinion).
The sort of robust political debate encouraged by the First Amendment is bound to produce speech that is critical of those who hold public office or those public figures who are "intimately involved in the resolution of important public questions or, by reason of their fame, shape events in areas of concern to society at large." Associated Press v. Walker, decided with Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts, 388 U.S. 130, 164 (1967) (Warren, C. J., concurring in result). Justice Frankfurter put it succinctly in Baumgartner v. United States, 322 U.S. 665, 673 -674 (1944), when he said that "[o]ne of the prerogatives of American citizenship is the right to criticize public men and measures." Such criticism, inevitably, will not always be reasoned or moderate; public figures as well as public officials will be subject to "vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks," New York Times, supra, at 270. "[T]he candidate who vaunts his spotless record and sterling integrity cannot convincingly cry `Foul!' when an opponent or an industrious reporter attempts [485 U.S. 46, 52] to demonstrate the contrary." Monitor Patriot Co. v. Roy, 401 U.S. 265, 274 (1971).
The eBay Shopping.com Affair
The eBay Shopping.com Affair
aka "The eBay Leap Day Auction Count Affair"
aka "The eBay SDC_PROD Affair"
By Event Horizon
Ides of March Edition, 15 March 2008
Revision: 2 April 2008 00:01 HST
The Leap Day weekend brought with it an extra day of buy and selling on eBay. It also ushered in an interesting event. A number of listings from Shopping.com, an eBay company, ended up on eBay.com. Counted in the hundreds of thousands these product listings were viewable on eBay.com, but not buyable.
In short an event that AuctionBytes would characterize as eBay Mystery Listings.
This was an event that had ample room for opinions. Aside from the fact that the average eBay buyer could not buy these products, there was the question of did these listings affect the auction counts? An important question as eBay provides those listing counts in their many reports to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Opinions ranged from an eBay Forum poster describing the event as "Ebay is padding their listings", to Randy Smythe of My Blog Utopia! stating "this padding of listings is a non-starter."
All this would definitely pique the curiosity of anyone interested in eBay. For about 5 seconds. Because all the relevant data is spread across Google, or deleted, archived, horded, and just plain not in one place for quick perusal. End 5 seconds.
We're going to attempt to put a smidgen of all that happened in this article. And over time expand the article slightly to accommodate new found pieces.
Before we begin, changing the subject slightly, you're wondering why the style of the title sounds oddly familiar? We were inspired by eBay, with their one mini-smidgen contribution.
Cue theme. Run introduction. Roll article.
Prologue. Internet transations are perishable and human memories short.
This article should not be considered a complete rendering of the Leap Day (2/29/2008) weekend events or a tome with all the available data. It is meant to give a relatively quick overview of the situation, and provide leads for those who wish to pursue more in depth study.
I. How many listings were involved?
Do Listing Counts Matter?
Let's start with the simple matter of, does it matter at all? The answer is, Yes.
Listing counts are important to eBay, as the figures are reported to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Reference the "23-Jan-2008" "Form 8-K for EBAY INC" "Results of Operations and Financial Condition, Financial Statements and Exhibits" report.
Listing counts are important to eBay, as they are mentioned in the report to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Reference the "29-Feb-2008" "Form 10-K for EBAY INC" "Annual Report".
The fact that eBay has the subject of "listings" in their official reports, belies pundits claims that the listing counts are of no concern.
Those who proffer the specious argument that the amounts involved are small and therefore inconsequential, must not deal often in large real world real time computer systems. Let's propose the scenario that someone or some group accidentally dumps a quarter million to a half million database TEST records into a PRODUCTION system. This same person or group then tells people in authority nonsense such as 'it's 35 thousand Usher'.
This is what those people would hear in the real world:
eBay's official position on the number of listings.
"An eBay spokesman told PC Magazine at the time that 5,000 shopping.com listings were erroneously placed on ebay.com. After sellers expressed doubt about that number in the comments section, eBay was asked to again confirm that it was indeed 5,000. The same spokesman responded Friday that he had originally told PC Magazine that eBay pulled 35,000 listings, but a review of the interview confirmed that he said 5,000."
PC Magazine, 10 March 2008
{eBay, Usher} "Lieberman said fewer than 35,000 listings were affected by the glitch".
AuctionBytes, 5 March 2008
Usher Lieberman is eBay's Spokesman, and is not an integral part of eBay's programming departments. He reports to the press what he's told. In the matter of contradictory statements or "false and misleading statements to the press" [SEC], the original source of the "5,000" and "35,000" counts should be investigated.
Our research regarding the listing counts during the February 29th Leap Day weekend.
Total Listings Hard Count Methodology.
The "Hard Count" represents the total number of auction listings confirmed by screen shots, archives, and reported by AuctionBytes. In theory the Hard Count should equal or be close to the Soft Count. But in practice it is not an easy task to collect hard evidence, from multiple witnesses, after the fact.
The 31,608 figure derives from the AuctionBytes observation that "indicated the seller had over 80,000 listings on eBay.com."
AuctionBytes does not reveal the identity of that seller. Making it possible that the seller with "80,000" items is part of the list of observed sellers. The 31,608 figure is derived from taking "80,000" and subtracting the largest listing count reported, which is 48,392. In this way listing counts are not added in twice.
In other words, if the seller with item count of "48,392" (part of the observed list of sellers) actually has "80,000" items, the total should be 161,358 + 31,608. The 31,608 being the uncounted part of the "80,000" (80,000 - 48,392). The 31,608 can increase to a maximum of 80,000, depending on who the seller is or is not.
For instance in the case of this seller not being on the reported list of 14 sellers, the soft count would be 161,358 plus 80,000 or 241,368.
There is also the case of the count from AuctionBytes being completely wrong; 0 items.
The Hard Count ranges from a minimum of 161,358 items, to a maximum of 241,368 items.
Total Listings Soft Count Methodology.
The "Soft Count" represents the total number of auction listings reported, but not necessarily verified by screen captures, etc.. The figure of 271,280 is the lower limit of those reported observations. As in the Hard Count, the 31,608 figure derives from the AuctionBytes observation that "indicated the seller had over 80,000 listings on eBay.com."
The observed Soft Count ranges from a minimum of 271,280 items, to a maximum of 351,280 items.
Estimated Listing Count Methodology.
Using the Medved "EBay Auction Counts: February 24, 2008 to March 1, 2008" chart, an estimate can be made as to the number of listings removed.
eBay stipulated two things:
Logically we're looking for an increase and subsequent rapid decrease of at least 161,358 (Hard Count) listings and up to 351,280 (Soft Count), during the weekend time frame.
As it turns out there is just such an occurrence. There is an auction count spike in the auction count beginning at about the "2/29" (09:00 PM PST, Midnight EST) line and ending at about the "3/2" (09:00 PM PST, Midnight EST) line. From a graphing standpoint this increase conveniently begins after a relatively flat period of auction listings.
That would be approximately 13,900,000 (peak) - 13,400,000 (base) = 500,000 listings
http://www.medved.net/cgi-bin/cal.exe?EIND Chart times are Eastern Standard Time (EST).
Using Randy Smythe's 13.5 million average daily auction listings as a measure, the half-a-million auction listings represents 3.7% of the daily total. A significant amount as far as the report by eBay's Accountants to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is concerned.
Is There More?
The question arises, were there more "test" listings. Our answer is, you are free to ponder this question.
But think about this. eBay held a listing special beginning on March 1st. Historically auction counts rise during a listing special. Typically a million or more. How many listings would have to be removed to not only negate the expected listing count increase, but cause the count to fall?
And ponder this too. As a matter of good business, eBay does put back listings removed in error. Such an increase due to putting back deleted listings would show up much later on Medved ("EBay Auction Counts: March 2, 2008 to March 8, 2008"). Abet buried in subsequent listing specials and promotions.
http://www.medved.net/cgi-bin/cal.exe?EIND Chart times are Eastern Standard Time (EST).
eBay's 2008 Q1 (1st Quarter, January 01 to March 31) report to the U.S. Security and Exchange Commission should be interesting.
II. SDC_PROD Seller List and Counts
We believe that none of the Shopping.com sellers were aware their items were being transferred to eBay.com. As stipulated by eBay, "Shopping.com listings appeared accidentally on eBay.com". It would be an interesting exercise to find out if the involved Shopping.com sellers were billed eBay.com listing fees at the time, and then credited afterwards.
SDC_PROD Seller List
This is a list of the fourteen (14) "sdc_prod" (shopping dot com) seller accounts that were located and reported, 29 February to 1 March 2008. Plus additional sdc_prod sellers that were located post event.
This list contains:
The total count from the screen captures, 161,358, is evidence that eBay Spokesman Usher Lieberman made a number of "false and misleading statements to the press" when he said on multiple occasions that "5,000 listings" or "35,000 listings" were involved.
Time permitting, this section will be updated.
* sdc_prod_301013_74
Shopping.com seller The Twister Group
Member since Oct-18-06 in Illinois, United States
* sdc_prod_305839_99
Shopping.com seller BargainBasementBatteries
Member since Oct-30-07 in California, United States
* sdc_prod_310426
Shopping.com seller ANTOnline
Member since Feb-15-08 in Georgia, United States
* sdc_prod_409455_97
Shopping.com seller Sababa Shopping
Member since Jul-16-07 in New York, United States
* sdc_prod_434012
Shopping.com seller SpectrumSuperStore
Member since Apr-11-07 in California, United States
* sdc_prod_442675_57
Shopping.com seller Boyne & Kelly L.L.C.
Member since Oct-25-07 in New Jersey, United States
eBay.com reported listing count, 4,702
* sdc_prod_9021_2
Shopping.com seller Buy.com
Member since Feb-22-08 in California, United States
* sdc_prod_9055
Shopping.com seller Focus Camera
Member since Oct-30-07 in New York, United States
* sdc_prod_9074_35
Shopping.com seller pcRUSH.com
Member since Feb-28-08 in California, United States
* sdc_prod_9090
Shopping.com seller CompSource Inc.
Member since Mar-26-07 in Ohio, United States
* sdc_prod_9124_14
Shopping.com seller TheNerds, Inc.
Member since Dec-12-07 in Florida, United States
* sdc_prod_9352_67
Shopping.com seller Digital Foto Club
Member since May-28-07 in New York, United States
* sdc_prod_9391_43
Shopping.com seller Adorama
Member since Feb-22-08 in New York, United States
* sdc_prod_9452
Shopping.com seller eTronics, Inc.
Member since Jul-25-07 in New York, United States
* sdc_prod_90076
Shopping.com seller OnlineSports, Inc.
Member since Nov-13-06 in California, United States
III. What Happened?
There are two basic explanations.
We had planned to explore and write about each possibility, but we'll leave that for another time.
IV. "THIS IS NOT AN EBAY LISTING"
Event Timeframe
Like many incidents, there are events that lead up to it, follow it, are associated with it, or simply happen in the same time frame.
Here is a short chronology of those occurrences.
== 2007 ==
.
February 2007
http://www.medved.net/cgi-bin/cal.exe?EIND Chart times are Eastern Standard Time.
.
9 March 2007
Are Ebay's Listing Numbers Inflated by Fraud?
03/09/2007 08:31 PM ID: 60834
Ebay Inc's (NASDAQ:EBAY) listing numbers have demonstrated dramatic volatility during the 'Vladuz' security scare. Some Ebay users have suggested that the millions of fraudulent listings are significantly inflating Ebay's listing numbers.
In response, an Ebay spokesperson claims: "there just isn't enough information there to tie the swings in listings that they show to any one cause". They declined to comment as to the number of accounts that may have been compromised.
It is also suggested that Medved's calculations for Ebay's total of listing numbers are overestimated too. As the Ebay spokesperson confirms, the Medved statistics used to quantify Ebay's listing numbers "far exceed our real activity in this area".
Source: www.theregister.co.uk
http://www.medved.net/cgi-bin/cal.exe?EIND Chart times are Eastern Standard Time.
== 2008 ==
.
13 February 2008
"February 13th, insertion fees for all auction-style and fixed price listings will be only 20 cents!"
Stephanie Tilenius, General Manager for eBay North America
"20¢ Auction-style and Fixed Price listing fees" (eBay)
http://www.medved.net/cgi-bin/cal.exe?EIND Chart times are Eastern Standard Time.
.
20 February 2008
Start of eBay Policy changes and media fee cut.
*** A Message from Bill Cobb - New Pricing and Other News ***
General Announcements
January 29, 2008 | 05:59 AM PST/PT
***A Message from Lorrie Norrington – New Media Category Pricing Effective February 20***
"I am pleased to announce we are accelerating our plan to phase-in category-specific pricing for media. This fee cut will coincide with the site-wide pricing changes previously announced to take effect on February 20."
Lorrie Norrington, President of eBay Global Marketplace Operations, February 11, 2008 | 10:01AM PST/PT
.
20 February 2008
Regarding the events of February 20th.
"The bug was related to the gallery feature that allows users to place a small photo of their item on the initial search returns page, a spokesman said. EBay traditionally charged 35 cents to include a gallery photo, but as part of the policy changes that went into effect February 20, they are now free of charge.
However, "the code actually rolled out three hours late, so there were a certain number of listings ... that didn't get gallery free"
Usher Lieberman eBay Spokesman to PC Magazine, 4 March 2008
.
20 February 2008
"the bug first emerged on Friday"
"But it wasn't a test. It ended up being a bug," Usher Lieberman
Usher Lieberman eBay Spokesman to PC Magazine, 4 March 2008
Despite Usher Lieberman's assertion that the "bug" happened on February 29th, there is evidence showing sdc_prod products appearing before the 29th.
While there are reports of sdc_prod listings appearing as early as December 2007, the earliest evidence of a "bug" is 20 February 2008.
Samples of a Shopping.com listings inserted onto eBay.com.
"Items for sale by sdc_prod_310426"
"Time listed" "Feb-20 15:49"
.
22 February 2008
Samples of a Shopping.com listings inserted onto eBay.com.
"Items for sale by sdc_prod_409455_97"
"Time listed" "Feb-22 10:22"
Google archive - February 29, 2008 16:37:41 GMT
Seller sdc_prod_434012, item number 320199419130, 30 day auction listing. Seller has no 30 day store. Start date February 22nd
"eBay (item 320199419130 end time March-22-08 06:45:06 PDT)" screen shot.
.
23 February 2008
Sample of a Shopping.com listing inserted onto eBay.com.
Listings on eBay.com are accessible on eBay International sites, such as eBay South Korea (ebay.auction.co.kr).
Google archive - Feb 29, 2008 22:42:51 GMT
Seller sdc_prod_310426, item number 120225811907. Start date February 23rd.
Time remaining on 30 day listing, 23 days 3 hours 35 minutes 46 seconds, screen shot
.
23 February 2008
05:49 AM PST
redsbe (Private ) Feb-23-08 05:49 PST 1 of 33
.
27 February 2008
06:04:36 PM PST
PayPal and eBay Pay Shoppers to Shop
AuctionBytes
By: Ina Steiner
Wed Feb 27 2008 18:04:36
.
28 February 2008
04:30 PM PST, 7:30 PM EST (Eastern Standard Time)
eBay Auction count at lowest point of the day; 13,393,000 items.
Coincidentally, or not, at about the time many of eBay's employees head for home, the auction count begins to rise. Did some programmer turn something on, and leave for the day, intending to check on the code's progress the following morning?
Auction count rises to 13,405,000 by 07:30 PST, 10:30 EST.
http://www.medved.net/cgi-bin/cal.exe?EIND Chart times are Eastern Standard Time.
.
28 February 2008
09:00:01 PM PST, 12:00:01 AM 29 February EST (Eastern Standard Time).
Medved "EBay Auction Counts" approximately 13,425,000 items. First count on the February 29th chart.
http://www.medved.net/cgi-bin/cal.exe?EIND Chart times are Eastern Standard Time (EST).
.
28 February 2008
11:59:59 PM PST
"eBay is running a marketing campaign to encourage buyers to shop on its site by offering them coupons. One buyer sent AuctionBytes a coupon he had received (pictured) that offered $5 toward shipping on any one item. Part of the terms and conditions follows:
This Offer is valid only when you pay with, and seller accepts, PayPal. This Offer is intended for the recipient whose eBay User ID is printed on the Offer and purchase must be made on eBay.com with that eBay User ID. This Offer is not transferable.
This Offer is for one-time use. It may only be redeemed on the total shipping cost of an item or items on one purchase from a single seller, using a single method of shipping and single currency, in a single transaction. This Offer expires February 28, 2008 at 11:59:59 PM (PST)."
AuctionBytes, Wed Feb 27 2008 18:04:36
.
29 February 2008
04:23 AM PST
eBay Developer's Program
eBay Developer Forums > Technical Questions: eBay Shopping Web Services
Exclude Sellers Issue
Re: ExcludeSellers Issue
Posted: Feb 29, 2008 4:23 AM
"Because of the wide variety of searches that we do, we could easily use 200 to 400 ID's. 500 would be a good number for us."
stsi.com
The above statement is in response to the earlier part of the thread:
Re: ExcludeSellers Issue
Feb 29, 2008 4:27 AM
"Also, is it possible to use wildcards for excluded sellers? For example, I'd like to exclude the various iterations of sdc_prod_*, instead of having to type in all the numbers that this seller uses...."
stsi.com
.
29 February 2008
10:00 AM PST, 01:00 PM Eastern Standard Time
Medved "EBay Auction Counts" reaches maximum for the day of approximately 13,900,000 items. The
previous low count was 13,393,000 items on February 28th at 04:30 PM PST, 7:30 EST. An increase of about half-a-million listings in 16.5 hours.
Coincidentally, or not, during the time many of eBay's employees show up at work, the auction count abruptly stops rising.
One scenario:
A case could be made that by 10AM eBay applied working corrective action on the sdc_prod listing problem. Because at this point the auction count drops.
http://www.medved.net/cgi-bin/cal.exe?EIND Chart times are Eastern Standard Time (EST).
.
29 February 2008
01:00 PM PST, 04:00 PM Eastern Standard Time
Medved "EBay Auction Counts" drops slightly approximately 13,875,000 items, from 13,900,000 items. Last count of the February 29th chart.
.
29 February 2008
Regarding the events of "Friday night" 29 February 2008.
eBay's statements:
1) "a "bug" in its system had accidentally placed listings from eBay-owned shopping.com onto eBay.com late Friday night."
However, "the code actually rolled out three hours late, so there were a certain number of listings ... that didn't get gallery free, so we were going back and fixing that" on Friday, the spokesman said. "What happened was, when we wrote the code to implement that fix in the database table, there was a string that was left on there that populated and sent shopping.com listings onto ebay.com that it shouldn't have."
Approximately 5,000 listings were pulled from shopping.com, but they have since been removed, according to eBay."
PC Magazine, 4 March 2008
2) "eBay spokesperson Usher Lieberman initially told AuctionBytes they appeared due to a test, but on Monday, said he was incorrect and that the listings were the result of a glitch.
On Tuesday, Lieberman explained the nature of the glitch. Programmers rolled out code on Friday evening that was meant to credit certain listings that were eligible for free Gallery. The credit was due to them because eBay had promised sellers Gallery would be free for listings started at a certain time of day, and the code had been rolled out 3 hours past the deadline.
Lieberman said the programmers inadvertently caused the Shopping.com listings to appear on eBay.com when it created and launched the script to credit the sellers' accounts for Gallery fees.
Lieberman said fewer than 35,000 listings were affected by the glitch."
AuctionBytes, 5 March 2008
3) "An eBay spokesman told PC Magazine at the time that 5,000 shopping.com listings were erroneously placed on ebay.com. After sellers expressed doubt about that number in the comments section, eBay was asked to again confirm that it was indeed 5,000. The same spokesman responded Friday that he had originally told PC Magazine that eBay pulled 35,000 listings, but a review of the interview confirmed that he said 5,000."
PC Magazine, 10 March 2008
4) "Editor's Note: The eBay spokesman confirmed Monday that the number of postings pulled from shopping.com was indeed 35,000."
PC Magazine, 10 March 2008
.
29 February 2008
06:41 PM PST
First responders to Shopping.com listing anomaly.
By this time, the Medved "EBay Auction Counts" are somewhere between 13,875,000 listings (29 February 2008 01:00 PM PST) and 13,502,000 listings (1 March 2008 08:30 AM PST). "Between" as the Medved chart is blank between those times.
A possible scenario would be that eBay has been deleting listings since 10:00 AM; at least 8 hours. Or we should say an eBay application has been deleting sdc_prod listings.
eBay's March 1st Listing Special begins in 5 hours 19 minutes.
eBay user comments, edited.
mm*mc (154) Feb-29-08 18:41 PST
neverstopsworking (127) Feb-29-08 18:49 PST
.
29 February 2008
07:25 PM PST
Referenced by PC Magazine article.
mydiscountstation (921 ) Feb-29-08 19:25 PST
.
29 February 2008
08:56 PM PST
eBay user comments, edited.
cmiprch (1732 ) Feb-29-08 20:56 PST 44 of 418
cmiprch (1732 ) Feb-29-08 21:19 PST 48 of 418
.
29 February 2008
09:29 PM PST
Referenced by PC Magazine article.
monkey_business304 (0 ) Feb-29-08 21:29 PST
windorphin (31 ) Feb-29-08 21:40 PST 4 of 273
.
29 February 2008
10:25 PM PST
eBay user comments, edited.
moopy_inc (5562 ) Feb-29-08 22:25 PST 240 of 516
orange_cape_hides_me (Private ) Feb-29-08 22:30 PST 25 of 51
.
29 February 2008
10:31:50 PM PST, 12:31:50 CST &1:31:50 AM 1 March EST
12:31:50 AM CST
"I see. Actually, this is not an eBay listing, the problem is it's a Shopping.com listing that is showing on our site by mistake."
Evan M. A., eBay Live Help Customer Service
12:32:25 AM CST
It is a current issue, yes, we have a bug on it. These are meant to be on shopping.com only but due to some reason are showing on eBay as well and can't be bought through the site."
Evan M. A., eBay Live Help Customer Service
.
29 February 2008
10:35 PM PST
eBay user comments, edited.
badmomster (Private) Feb-29-08 20:35 PST 68 of 521
niruss (1979) Feb-29-08 20:36 PSST 70 of 521
bosshossman1 (1 ) Feb-29-08 22:33 PST 255 of 516
justinal (391 ) Feb-29-08 22:45 PST 31 of 273
aenthal (2243 ) Feb-29-08 23:04 PST 34 of 273
krs6670 (107 ) Feb-29-08 23:12 PST 35 of 273
Feb-29-08 23:36 PST 385 of 700
vsbeauty53 (15 ) Feb-29-08 23:59 PST 17 of 421
.
1 March 2008
Regarding the events of Saturday 1 March 2008.
"This was a limited test that has run its course" Usher Lieberman, eBay Spokesperson
AuctionBytes, 1 March 2008 01:56:54 AM PST
"He said he had made a mistake when he called the Shopping.com listings a test on Saturday morning. He was trying to track it down and after talking to a few people, felt comfortable saying it was a test, and subsequently found out the listings had appeared accidentally. Usher said it was his fault for initially getting it wrong."
Ina Steiner, AuctionBytes, 4 March 2008 04:02:46 AM PST
"AuctionBytes looked at one Shopping.com selling account on Saturday morning, it indicated the seller had over 80,000 listings on eBay.com"
Ina Steiner, AuctionBytes, 5 March 2008
.
1 March 2008
12:00:01 AM PST, 3:00:01 AM Easter Standard Time
eBay listing upgrade special, "2 days only March 1-2", begins. eBay sellers can list products at reduced prices. Historically the auction counts rise significantly during these eBay specials.
***Get Gallery Plus, Value Pack, Featured Plus!, and Picture Pack at a Discount This Weekend***
"The promotion will start on Saturday, March 1, 2008 at 00:00:01 Pacific time (12:00 a.m. plus one second) and end on Sunday, March 2, 2008 at 23:59:59 Pacific time (11:59 p.m. plus 59 seconds)."
There is no 12:00:01 AM count per sec, as there is a gap in the record from 01:00 PM PST (04:00 PM EST) February 29th to 08:30 AM PST (11:30 AM EST) March 1st.
13,875,000 listings, 29 February 2008 01:00 PM PST (04:00 PM EST)
http://www.medved.net/cgi-bin/cal.exe?EIND Chart times are Eastern Standard Time (EST).
.
1 March 2008
00:02 AM PST
eBay user comments, edited.
vsbeauty53 (15 ) Mar-01-08 00:02 PST 20 of 426
moopy_inc (5562 ) Mar-01-08 00:17 PST 459 of 786
atticcleanin (35 ) Mar-01-08 00:25 PST 477 of 786
buyingcarsforfun (80 ) Mar-01-08 01:36 PST 574 of 669
.
1 March 2008
01:56:54 AM PST
Mystery Shopping.com Listings on eBay?
By: Ina Steiner, AuctionBytes
Sat Mar 1 2008 01:56:54
Excerpt:
.
1 March 2008
05:20 AM PST
eBay user comment, edited.
molerfamily (1 ) Mar-01-08 05:20 PST 69 of 273
.
1 March 2008
time unknown
eBay Numbers Inflated By Shopping.com Product Listings?
Pheebay.com
Date: 03/01/2008
Excerpts:
.
1 March 2008
06:18 AM PST
eBay user comments, edited.
flaura22 (333 ) Mar-01-08 06:18 PST 79 of 418
shwp1 (1919 ) Mar-01-08 07:03 PST 681 of 878
the*katy*workshop (1468 ) Mar-01-08 07:11 PST 683 of 878
type2mtg (51 ) Mar-01-08 07:10 PST 43 of 426
the*katy*workshop (1468 ) Mar-01-08 07:13 PST 685 of 786
.
1 March 2008
08:10 AM PST, 16:10 GMT
200k Shopping.com items appear on eBay
TameBay
Author: Chris Dawson
Posted at: Saturday, March 1st, 2008 at 4:10 pm
Tags for this post: eBay.com, shopping.com, Snafu
Excerpt:
sdc_prod_9124_14 The listings had no bid/bin links, simply a link to add to watched items leading so speculation that eBay are using them to increase listing numbers. A more rational explanation is that some one made an error in launching Shopping.com listings onto eBay and the error was swiftly reversed."
.
1 March 2008
08:21 AM PST
eBay user comment, edited.
emovieposter.com (20539 ) Mar-01-08 08:21 PST 84 of 418
.
1 March 2008
08:30 AM PST, 11:30 AM EST
Medved "EBay Auction Counts" approximately 13,502,000 items. The auction count was previously
13,875,000 listings (29 February 2008 01:00 PM PST)
Eight and a half hours into eBay's listing upgrade special, "2 days only March 1-2", and the auction count is falling.
http://www.medved.net/cgi-bin/cal.exe?EIND Chart times are Eastern Standard Time (EST).
.
1 March 2008
09:27 AM PST
eBay user comment, edited.
sandrarn83 (2919 ) Mar-01-08 09:27 PST 52 of 426
Comment, edited.
Randy Smythe Says:
March 1st, 2008 at 5:30 pm (17:30 GMT), 09:30 AM PST
eBay user comments, edited.
djcarlos1 (3838 ) Mar-01-08 09:46 PST 93 of 418
Say it isn't so, Joel?
Posted: Mar-01-08 11:23 PST
boycott*victoriously (17 ) Posts: 2,108
.
1 March 2008
01:02 PM PST, 03:02 PM CST
eBay Customer Service Agent (Lanie R.) and an eBay customer:
15:02 Agent Sent Message: I'm sorry for the inconvenience.This is actually an issue on the site right now I'm afraid. This is actually a Shopping.com listing that's appearing incorrectly on eBay.
15:03 Agent Sent Message: Our Technical team is working on getting resolved though, and I had this reported for you so we can add your account to the list.
15:03 Customer: Do these incorrect listings show up in ebays total listings/ Wouldn't they scew the listings totals?
15:04 Agent Sent Message: Oh, no it shouldn't though.
15:05 Agent Sent Message: The team is checking on the accounts of the sellers you reported as well for further investigation.
15:05 Customer: Shoudn't or absolutely doesn't?
15:05 Agent Sent Message: Absolutely doesn't.This is only a glitch on the search pages.
15:06 Agent Sent Message: You can check it from time to time to see it not on the eBay pages, only on Shopping.com
15:06 Customer: can you explain that a little further?
15:08 Customer: I'm not familiar with shopping.com. Why would their listings show up on ebay. Anf the one I mentionaed has ebay seller feedback.
15:08 Agent Sent Message: Sure! In the eBay account of the seller for items sold at eBay, it shouldn't get reflected, but if you were referring to the "items from seller" link for all items he is selling, I'm afraid the Shopping.com items will also appear and is confirmed as a tec
15:08 Agent Sent Message: hnical glitch.
15:09 Customer: can you respond to my last question also?
15:09 Agent Sent Message: Sorry for the confusion, Shopping.com is a specialty site owned by eBay but we handle separate accounts. It's similar to Express or Half.com
3/1/2008 15:10 Agent Sent Message: Ah, okay, Here's what happens, this particular seller has an account with SHopping.com to sell items, which is a different one as an eBay seller.
.
1 March 2008
01:12 PM PST
eBay user comments, edited.
suzisstuff (3233 ) Mar-01-08 13:12 PST 8 of 33
molerfamily (1 ) Mar-01-08 14:08 PST 195 of 273
rjrkea (3275 ) View Listings | Report Mar-01-08 13:56 PST 112 of 418
.
1 March 2008
2:55 PM, time zone unknown
eBay padding listing numbers on Auction site?
www.companyexposed.com
March 1, 2008
Published by admin @ 2:55 pm
Excerpt:
.
1 March 2008
2:56 PM PST
eBay user comment, edited.
The Number of Auctions
Posted: Mar-01-08 14:56 PST
lacemaker3 (300 ) Posts: 3,874
.
1 March 2008
time unknown
Ebay Padding Counts w Fake Listings in Wake of Strike?
From: cappnonymous
Added: March 01, 2008
.
1 March 2008
05:24 PM PST
eBay user comment, edited
cloudberry121 (18 ) Mar-01-08 17:24 PST 18 of 20
.
1 March 2008
time unknown
Bogus Listings!!!
By dhoosierswife
Is eBay POSSIBLY padding their listings numbers???
By dhoosierswife
.
1 March 2008
06:06 PM PST
eBay user comments, edited
just_not_thinking (0 ) Mar-01-08 18:06 PST 68 of 426
vsbeauty53 (15 ) Mar-01-08 18:14 PST 71 of 333
pepins4b8e (21 ) Mar-01-08 18:16 PST 73 of 333
sojo2004 (2698 ) Mar-01-08 18:23 PST 78 of 333
.
1 March 2008
07:00 PM PST, 10:00 PM EST (Eastern Standard Time)
Medved "EBay Auction Counts" approximately 13,455,000 items. Auction count at the lowest point of the day.
.
1 March 2008
08:09 PM PST
eBay user comment, edited.
time2buy1949 (Private ) Feb-29-08 20:09 PST
.
1 March 2008
08:30 PM PST, 11:30 PM Eastern Standard Time
Medved "EBay Auction Counts" approximately 13,460,000 items. Last count of the March 1st chart.
Note auction count spike beginning at the "2/29" (09:00 PM PST, Midnight EST) line and ending at the "3/2" (09:00 PM PST, Midnight EST) line.
http://www.medved.net/cgi-bin/cal.exe?EIND Chart times are Eastern Standard Time (EST).
.
1 March 2008
08:34 PM PST
eBay user comment, edited.
erimess (10 ) Mar-01-08 20:34 PST 238 of 273
.
1 March 2008
10:00 PM PST, 01:00 AM 2 March EST (Eastern Standard Time)
Medved "EBay Auction Counts" approximately 13,425,000 items. First count on the March 2nd chart.
.
2 March 2008
00:34 AM PST
eBay user comment, edited.
oldspartantrader (3913 ) Mar-02-08 00:34 PST 100 of 425
.
2 March 2008
07:00 AM PST, 10:00 AM EST
Medved "EBay Auction Counts" approximately 13,470,000 items. Second listing count peak of the weekend.
Previous peak count was approximately 13,900,000 items, on February 29th at 10 AM PST
http://www.medved.net/cgi-bin/cal.exe?EIND Chart times are Eastern Standard Time (EST).
.
2 March 2008
07:04 AM PST
eBay user comments, edited
Shopping.com, Half.com and Ebay Express
Posted: Mar-02-08 07:04 PST
dakota_exchange (2844 ) Posts: 5,856
Shopping.com, Half.com and Ebay Express
Posted: Mar-02-08 08:01 PST
pakardbelle (272 ) Posts: 1,019
.
2 March 2008
08:26:53 AM PST
Comment, edited.
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 08:26:53 -0800 (PST)
.
2 March 2008
11:13 AM PST
eBay user comments, edited
audlee-e-nuff-treasures (860 ) Mar-02-08 11:13 PST 32 of 432
markd13 (84 ) Mar-02-08 11:19 PST 38 of 432
.
2 March 2008
02:31 PM PST, 05:31 PM Easter Standard Time
Is eBay Fluffing The Numbers With Test Auctions??
Doc's Suspended From eBay Blog
March 2, 2008
Published by admin at 5:31 pm
Excerpt:
.
2 March 2008
02:32 PM PST
eBay System Status Announcement Board
***Resolved: Shopping.com listings on eBay***
"Some Shopping.com listings appeared accidentally on eBay.com over the past two days. This system issue has been resolved. We apologize for any confusion or inconvenience this may have caused."
.
2 March 2008
03:53 PM PST
eBay user comments, edited
thehairball (973 ) Mar-02-08 15:53 PST 143 of 432
magisterrex (6944 ) Mar-02-08 15:54 PST 170 of 418
.
2 March 2008
04:01 PM PST, 00:01 GMT March 3
Comment, edited.
Chris Dawson Says:
March 3rd, 2008 at 12:01 am
.
2 March 2008
04:01 PM, time zone unknown
eBay censoring info about padded listings on it's forums
www.companyexposed.com
March 2, 2008
By admin @ 4:01 pm
Excerpt:
.
2 March 2008
03:53 PM PST
eBay user comments, edited
aviation (3802 ) Mar-02-08 16:29 PST 187 of 418
in-weave (7349 ) Mar-02-08 16:56 PST 197 of 418
.
2 March 2008
8:30 PM PST, 11:30 PM Eastern Standard Time
Medved "EBay Auction Counts" approximately 13,330,000 items. Last count of the March 2nd chart.
.
2 March 2008
10:06 PM PST
eBay user comment, edited.
just_not_thinking (0 ) Mar-02-08 22:06 PST 145 of 425
.
2 March 2008
11:59 PM PST, 2:59 AM 3 March Eastern Standard Time
eBay listing upgrade special, "2 days only March 1-2" ends.
According to the Medved "EBay Auction Counts", at the time the listing special ended the count was approximately 13,355,000 items. The count at the start of the listing special was about 13,502,000 listings. An overall decrease.
http://www.medved.net/cgi-bin/cal.exe?EIND Chart shows auction counts by days of the month, Eastern Standard Time.
http://www.medved.net/cgi-bin/cal.exe?EIND Chart times are Eastern Standard Time (EST).
.
3 March 2008
Regarding the events and comments of Monday March 3rd.
"I spoke to eBay's Usher Lieberman during the IMA conference on Monday. He said he had made a mistake when he called the Shopping.com listings a test on Saturday morning. He was trying to track it down and after talking to a few people, felt comfortable saying it was a test, and subsequently found out the listings had appeared accidentally. Usher said it was his fault for initially getting it wrong."
Ina Steiner, AutionBytes, 4 March 2008 04:02:46
"but on Monday, said he was incorrect and that the listings were the result of a glitch."
Ina Steiner on Usher Lieberman, AuctionBytes, 5 March 2008
.
3 March 2008
06:21 AM PST
eBay Running A Test with Shopping.com Listings-Sorry It Was An Accident?
ebay & Beyond: Basics to Business
Posted by David White at 3/3/2008 6:21 AM
Excerpt:
My Opinion
If it really was a test, eBay should have announced it before they ran it, on the system announcement board. This was no accident. eBay rarely does anything by accident, but if they do, it is corrected very quickly, not 2 or more days later."
.
3 March 2008
06:53 AM PST
eBay user comment, edited.
dorothysew (978 ) Mar-03-08 06:53 PST 157 of 425
.
3 March 2008
07:34 AM PST
Sponsored Ads a Huge Win for eBay!
My Blog Utopia!
Posted by Randy Smythe at 3/03/2008 07:34:00 AM
Excerpt:
.
3 March 2008
10:21 AM PST
eBay user comment, edited.
oldspartantrader (3884 ) Mar-03-08 10:21 PST 184 of 333
Comment, edited.
PAID BASHERS Definition of PADDING the Listing on eBay!
(2008-03-03 14:38:00) by elikeebayto...
.
4 March 2008
04:02:46 AM PST
Update to Shopping.com Mystery Listings on eBay
By: Ina Steiner, AuctionBytes
Tue Mar 4 2008 04:02:46
I spoke to eBay's Usher Lieberman during the IMA conference on Monday. He said he had made a mistake when he called the Shopping.com listings a test on Saturday morning. He was trying to track it down and after talking to a few people, felt comfortable saying it was a test, and subsequently found out the listings had appeared accidentally. Usher said it was his fault for initially getting it wrong.
I asked Usher if he could tell me more, and he could not. I asked him if we might expect to see Shopping.com listings on eBay in the future, or eBay.com listings on Shopping. He said eBay is looking at a lot of different things and can't speculate on anything.
"Lots of things are on the table," he said.
.
4 March 2008
04:02 AM PST
Regarding events and comments taking place on Tuesday March 4th.
"On Tuesday, Lieberman explained the nature of the glitch. Programmers rolled out code on Friday evening that was meant to credit certain listings that were eligible for free Gallery. The credit was due to them because eBay had promised sellers Gallery would be free for listings started at a certain time of day, and the code had been rolled out 3 hours past the deadline."
AuctionBytes, 5 March 2008
.
4 March 2008
Late afternoon, early evening
Ebay Accused of Padding Listing Numbers
PC Magazine
03.04.08
by Brian Heater and Chloe Albanesius
Excerpts:
.
4 March 2008
06:52 PM PST
ebay user comments, edited
oldspartantrader (3884 ) Mar-04-08 18:52 PST 199 of 333
bhearsch (302 ) Mar-04-08 21:08 PST 207 of 333
.
5 March 2008
Regarding the events and comments of Wednesday March 5th.
"Lieberman said fewer than 35,000 listings were affected by the glitch."
AuctionBytes, 5 March 2008
AuctionBytes releases the "80,000" figure to eBay and the public. They first observed this figure on March 1st. Four days earlier.
AuctionBytes becomes the first large news organization to report a count from direct observation of the situation. However AuctionBytes has not substantiated their claim with screen shots.
"Of the accusations of listing count manipulation, Lieberman said, "To think that we'd do that now is outrageous.""
AuctionBytes, 5 March 2008
.
5 March 2008
eBay Calls Claims of Manipulation 'Outrageous'
By: Ina Steiner, AuctionBytes
March 05, 2008
Excerpts:
.
5 March 2008
06:44AM PST
eBay user comment, edited
oldspartantrader (3884 ) Mar-05-08 06:44 PST 210 of 333
.
5 March 2008
Ziff Davis Media Files for Bankruptcy
By VINNEE TONG
.
5 March 2008
08:04 AM PST
eBay user comments, edited
oldspartantrader (3884 ) Mar-05-08 08:04 PST 212 of 333
jake-deals-4u (700 ) Mar-05-08 08:16 PST 213 of 333
pepins4b8e (21 ) Mar-05-08 08:41 PST 217 of 426
.
5 March 2008
09:04 AM PST
Comment, edited
El Radical
Escrito el: 05-Marzo-2008 a las 17:04
.
5 March 2008
03:18 PM PST
What's going on over at eBay?
BloggingStocks
Posted Mar 5th 2008 3:18PM by Michael Fowlkes
Excerpt:
.
5 March 2008
06:18 PM PST
eBay user comments, edited
jake-deals-4u (701 ) Mar-05-08 18:18 PST 242 of 426
badday911 (71 ) Mar-05-08 22:23 PST 46 of 70
vik*nan (33 ) Mar-05-08 23:25 PST 48 of 70
aenthal (2241 ) Mar-05-08 23:59 PST 54 of 70
windorphin (31 ) Mar-06-08 06:15 PST 61 of 70
.
6 March 2008
PC Magazine owner files Chapter 11
From the Associated Press
.
6 March 2008
05:22 PM PST
eBay user comments, edited
vik*nan (33 ) Mar-06-08 17:22 PST 2 of 31
uplatewhattodo (18 ) Mar-06-08 21:18 PST 11 of 31
.
6 March 2008
Despite eBay's announcement of March 2nd, that "system issue has been resolved", 'accidental' auction listings can still be found.
Seller sdc_prod_305839_99
"67 items found" ( LINK screen shot 3/6/2008 )
Seller sdc_prod_9352_67
"417 items found" ( LINK screen shot 3/6/2008 )
.
6 March 2008
10:23 PM PST
eBay user comment, edited
postericon (0 ) Mar-06-08 03:29 PST 263 of 426
.
6 March 2008
eBay Listings on the Rise! Must be the Fee Changes
My Blog Utopia!
Posted by Randy Smythe
Thursday, March 06, 2008
Excerpt:
.
7 March 2008
Regarding the events of Friday 7 March 2008.
PC Magazine, 10 March 2008:
.
7 March 2008
03:37 AM PST
eBay user comment, edited
schmoopie77 (109 ) Mar-07-08 03:37 PST 22 of 31
.
7 March 2008
eBay Hires Blogger to Improve Communications
By Ina Steiner, AuctionBytes.com
March 07, 2008
.
7 March 2008
Klicken sie hier, um diesen Artikel nicht zu kaufen
Eingestellt am 07. März 2008 um 18:57 Uhr
Excerpt:
.
8 March 2008
FIASCO AFTER FIASCO DOGS EBAY 2008 POLICY CHANGES
By Editor, March 8th, 2008 at 7:00 PM
Excerpt:
.
10 March 2008
Despite eBay's announcement of March 2nd that "system issue has been resolved", 'accidental' auction listings can still be found.
Seller sdc_prod_310426
70 items found ( screen shot 3/10/2008 )
Seller sdc_prod_434012
51 items found ( screen shot 3/10/2008 )
.
10 March 2008
Honest Eddy’s Used Cars oder: eBay - das ehrliche, offene Umfeld
Auktionsblog
Posted in Allgemein on Mrz 10, 2008
Excerpt:
Trotz der Ankündigungen seitens vieler US-Verkäufer, während des Streiks vom 18. bis 25. Februar keine Angebote zu listen sind die Angebotszahlen bei ebay.com im fraglichen Zeitraum fast nicht gesunken.
Eine genauere Erklärung dafür findet sich natürlich nicht im ebay-Forum sondern extern.
.
10 March 2008
May Day Boycott Looming, EBay Revises Impact of 'Bug'
PC Magazine
03.10.08
by Chloe Albanesius
Excerpt:
.
10 March 2008
Later in the day PC Magazine changes the title of their article from "May Day Boycott Looming, EBay Revises Impact of 'Bug'" to, "Another eBay Boycott Planned for May Day", and disables the AppScout link containing the lower part of the article.
And later a new AppScout link is created with the article reverting to the original title, "May Day Boycott Looming, EBay Revises Impact of 'Bug'".
And the interesting times continues.
Epilogue
Two weeks after the events of Leap Day Friday, we can draw one conclusion.
Thank you for reading.
...... returning to our March vacation ......
"Quashing and Creating Computer Bugs Since 1973"
//
//
//
Notes
Related article:
From eBay Seller Central - Ebay is padding their listings
http://eventhorizon1984.typepad.com/event_horizon_1984_blog/2008/02/from-ebay-sel-1.html
Article title:
Q: Why does the title of article keep changing?
A: We've altered the title to avoid being labeled as SPAM. Apparently Google considers variations of "sdc_prod" and "Shopping.com" to be SPAM, and removes direct links to such articles and items. Apparently late last year eBay began flooding Google with Shopping.com and sdc_prod* "advertising". Google's standard reaction to advertising SPAM is death by link removal.
//
//
//
The right to publish this news article - U.S. Supreme Court - 1988
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=case&court=us&vol=485&page=47
1988, CHIEF JUSTICE REHNQUIST:
At the heart of the First Amendment is the recognition of the fundamental importance of the free flow of ideas and opinions on matters of public interest and concern. "[T]he [485 U.S. 46, 51] freedom to speak one's mind is not only an aspect of individual liberty - and thus a good unto itself - but also is essential to the common quest for truth and the vitality of society as a whole." Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc., 466 U.S. 485, 503 -504 (1984). We have therefore been particularly vigilant to ensure that individual expressions of ideas remain free from governmentally imposed sanctions. The First Amendment recognizes no such thing as a "false" idea. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323, 339 (1974). As Justice Holmes wrote, "when men have realized that time has upset many fighting faiths, they may come to believe even more than they believe the very foundations of their own conduct that the ultimate good desired is better reached by free trade in ideas - that the best test of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market . . . ." Abrams v. United States, 250 U.S. 616, 630 (1919) (dissenting opinion).
The sort of robust political debate encouraged by the First Amendment is bound to produce speech that is critical of those who hold public office or those public figures who are "intimately involved in the resolution of important public questions or, by reason of their fame, shape events in areas of concern to society at large." Associated Press v. Walker, decided with Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts, 388 U.S. 130, 164 (1967) (Warren, C. J., concurring in result). Justice Frankfurter put it succinctly in Baumgartner v. United States, 322 U.S. 665, 673 -674 (1944), when he said that "[o]ne of the prerogatives of American citizenship is the right to criticize public men and measures." Such criticism, inevitably, will not always be reasoned or moderate; public figures as well as public officials will be subject to "vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks," New York Times, supra, at 270. "[T]he candidate who vaunts his spotless record and sterling integrity cannot convincingly cry `Foul!' when an opponent or an industrious reporter attempts [485 U.S. 46, 52] to demonstrate the contrary." Monitor Patriot Co. v. Roy, 401 U.S. 265, 274 (1971).
/*
Technorati Profile
EventHorizon1984 Log
//
Posted at 02:01 in Commentary, eBay, eBay Customer Service, eBay Search, eBay Spotlight, Legal | Permalink
Tags: 200K Shopping.com items appear on eBay, 23-Jan-2008, Adorama, aenthal, aenthal, Allgemein, ANTOnline, atticcleanin, auction, AuctionBytes, audlee-e-nuff-treasures, aviation, badday911, badmomster, Bargain Basement Batteries, BargainBasementBatteries, bhearsch, Bill Cobb, BloggingStocks, Bob Niland, bosshossman1, boycott*victoriously, Boyne & Kelly, Brian Heater, buyingcarsforfun, cappnonymous, Chloe Albanesius, Chris Dawson, cloudberry121, cmiprch, companyexposed.com, CompSource, dakota_exchange, David White, dhoosierswife, Digital Foto Club, djcarlos1, dorothysew, eBay, eBay censoring info about padded listings on it's forums, eBay Customer Service, eBay Live Help Customer Service, eBay Pulled 35000 listings, eBay Running A Test with Shopping.com Listings, eBay Shopping.com Affair, Eingestellt, El Radical, elike, emovieposter, emovieposter.com, erimess, eTronics, Event Horizon 1984, EventHorizon1984, ExcludeSellers, fake, fake listings, flaura22, Focus Camera, Form 8-K for EBAY INC, giovanni666, in-weave, Ina Steiner, Is eBay Fluffing The Numbers With Test Auctions, jake-deals-4u, just_not_thinking, justinal, krs6670, lacemaker3, Lieberman, listings, Lorrie Norrington, magisterrex, markd13, Medved, mm*mc, molerfamily, monkey_business304, moopy_inc, My Blog Utopia, mydiscountstation, mystery listings, Mystery Shopping.com Listings on eBay, Never underestimate the power of human stupidity, neverstopsworking, niruss, oldspartantrader, OnlineSports, orange_cape_hides_me, padded, padding, paid bashers, pakarbelle, PC Magazine, pcRUSH, pcRUSH.com, pepins4b8e, Pheebay.com, postericon, Randy Smythe, Rekha Patel, [email protected], rjrkea, sababa, sababa shopping, Sababa Shopping, schmoopie77, sdc, sdc_prod, sdc_prod_301013_74, sdc_prod_305839_99, sdc_prod_310426, sdc_prod_409455_97, sdc_prod_434012, sdc_prod_442675_57, sdc_prod_900076, sdc_prod_9021_2, sdc_prod_9055, sdc_prod_9074_35, sdc_prod_9090, sdc_prod_9124_14, sdc_prod_9352_67, sdc_prod_9391_43, sdc_prod_9452, shopping, Shopping.com, Shopping.com listings appeared accidentally on eBay.com, shwp1, sojo2004, Spectrum Super Store, SpectrumSuperStore, Sponsored Ads a Huge Win for eBay, Stephanie Tilenius, stsi.com, suzisstuff, the*katy*workshop, thehairball, TheNerds, thevirginmarypretzel, time2buy1949, Twister Group, type2mtg, uplatewhttodo, Usher, Usher Lieberman, vik*nan, vsbeauty53, windorphin
| Reblog (0)