Star Wars: The Old Republic Beta Test Observations
29 November 2011
EventHorizon1984
It was a warm November 21st. An evening made memorable by the arrival of an email that started with the following sentence.
You are invited to test Star Wars: The Old Republic!
It was not a phishing email.
Before going further:
- Star Wars: The Old RepublicTM is the property of LucasArts and LucasFilm and Electronic Arts (EA) and BioWare (a division of EA).
- Limited use of their material is covered under the Fair Use Doctrine.
- Beta testers are bound by an amended Game Testing Agreement.
- The November 25 2011 amendment to the non disclosure agreement reads:
You may well ask what is Star Wars: The Old Republic? According to EA, BioWare, and LucasArts:
We believe the game will be a hit, and reach an initial half-million subscribers. With one million subscribers by the end of the first year.
Of course we could be wrong, and the dim sour grapes view from a major competitor could be correct.
Of course the Activision CEO Bobby Kotick may have other motives for his comments.
About that beta test...
The beta test began November 25th, and sadly ended the evening of the 28th. I liked it.
Obligatory game play screen shot.
While now allowed to comment in detail on the game, I won't (mostly). The game has a very cinematic feel and the details would be one giant Spoiler Alert, because each character you play is story driven.
Do you really want to know who's your Daddy?
Besides other gaming experts will describe in excrutiating details ALL the spoilers, and ruin the experience.
Having said that ...
This is a Windows only game.
The beta software was a download of approximately 19GB. Buying a box set will save you from the hours it will take to download a fresh complete digital copy. Abet you will need to download any recent updates. However digital pre-order owners may get access to the game up to five days in advance.
'Getting into the game required very little instruction. Gameplay was as they say, intuitive. The character controls were smooth and responsive*, with no appreciable lag. However this may change when the first hundred thousand players sign in. blah, blah.
There is "shooter" action aplenty to keep a gamer occupied. You may enjoy sending that first hand launched missile at an opponent, and see the body (bodies) fly. Or 'feel' the impact of your light sabre in a fight. Or chuckle at the sound and graphics of a "Dirty Kick" attack; "oooh that's gotta hurt". Or find your companion outplaying you, as she goes all out Xena Warrior Princess medieval on an opponent. No graphic game violence though.
When you're in a large area with a few dozen other players battling it out, don't get killed watching.
You will find movie references.
"That's 'cause droids don't pull people's arms out of their sockets when they lose." Han Solo
SPOILER ALERT
But what was most disturbing, was uncovering why the Republic fell.
A Marker on Coruscant. The bane of Isaac Clarke's life.
Ok, not really a spoiler or Marker.
Star Wars: The Old Republic is scheduled for release in North America on 20 December 2011, and Europe on 22 December 2011.
/*
"Well, you may have thought it was a game, but it was also a test. Aha, a test! Sent out across the galaxy to find those with the potential to be Starfighters. And here you are, my boy! Here you are! "
Centauri (Robert Preston), The Last Starfighter (1984)
/*
Disclosure - Multiple copies of Star Wars: The Old Republic have been pre-ordered. Some here are Electronic Arts, BioWare, Amazon, Origin, GameStop, and Blizzard customers.
* Game was tested on two different systems:
- i7-2600K processor, 16GB memory, dual HD 6950 CrossFire
- i7-2600K processor, 16GB memory, dual HD 6850 CrossFire
/*
EcommerceBytes To Censor Reader Comments
EcommerceByes To Censor Reader Comments ... NOT REALLY
31 December 2011
EventHorizon1984
Based solely on the teaser title of this piece, you may have felt the need to post a comment.
Immediately.
Keep that feeling in mind should you read the rest of this article.
David Steiner said in the EcommerceBytes article "Should EcommerceBytes Blogs Be Verified Only?" about future comments:
Spam is the primary reason EcommerceBytes (formerly AuctionBytes) is considering the move toward requiring posters to verify themselves.
As Mr. Steiner put it:
He closed with, "We are interested in your perspective".
Our collective answer is No.
The Spam Solution
While we empathize with the Spam problem, one of our associates deals with about 50 spam and link emails daily, Spam is not justification for potentially throttling down reader comments.
As an extreme example of a login blog, view the comments on ChannelAdvisor CEO Scot Wingo's eBay Strategies Blog article "Holiday 2011 Late December Update - E-Commerce up >23%!!". The December 22nd article has zero comments. A similar article on EcommerceBytes would have more than zero comments.
With the computer industry contacts that EcommerceBytes has available, Spam control should never be an issue. Or an excuse.
The Improved Discussion Solution
Mr. Steiner stated:
With respect, most here haven't seen much of a "much more thoughtful approach". There are definitely less posts on average per article. Giving the appearance of a more civil conversation.
The Merriam-Webster definition of empirical:
The flip side of an empirical observation (emphasis mine):
A user verification system does Not guarantee "a more thoughful approach to a discussion" elsewhere on the Internet. One can find verified EcommerceBytes users, posting regularly on the Yahoo! eBay Message Board. The level of thoughful commentary there is sparse.
There are other sordid examples of user verified comment sites, with odious posts from (as I understand it) people with verified EcommerceBytes accounts.
Quality posts depend on the quality of site moderation, not user verfication.
David and Ina Steiner provide excellent site moderation. User verification has nothing to do with the post quality.
The Problem With Verification
"I think people forget that business is war and the most competitive medium right now is social media", Richard Hillgrove
What does being EcommerceBytes verified mean?
David Steiner said:
Verification means that account has an email address. Everything else need not necessarily be factual.
You might ask, 'what about the IP address?', 'can't people be tracked through their IP address?'.
Don't count on that IP being useful, or an indicator that a real person is attached to it. As Mr. Steiner observed:
A "proxy server is a computer that offers a computer network service to allow clients to make indirect network connections to other network services."
In other words, "they also hide the user's own IP address from the web sites they access through the proxy, they are sometimes also used to gain a degree of anonymity."
Any one, or any organization, can be anonymous. An anonymous IP is helpful to individuals protective of their privacy. But anonymity is critical to some businesses.
The BBC article "Fake forum comments are 'eroding' trust in the web" contained this blunt but understated passage:
The article "How big firms bash their rivals, in public and private" had this unkind passage:
It's a given that sock puppets will register. They don't get paid if they don't post. But does verification process keep out the "company stooges"? Who by "eroding trust" are a detriment to EcommerceBytes. Only Heaven and the Steiner's know.
However it is not a given that readership will register. If "it is invaluable to have a readership that is "plugged-in" (David Steiner), perhaps it is worth considering that most EcommerceBytes posters don't bother with login's.
Epilogue
At the beginning of this article, we asked you to remember how you felt about commenting.
You can do that here by writing below, and sending it. Period.
EcommenceBytes wants to implement a system where you:
If you're a regular poster, or sock puppet, registration is not a major pain.
But if you are 'just passing through', or the occasional reader, or spur of the moment type poster, that is new fresh readership, will you be waiting around a day or two to say something? Probably not.
Having watched and/or been a part of user verified sites since ARPANET and CompuServe, one social dynamic hasn't changed. Eventually two major posting groups form. Those who are passionate about a topic, and those paid to write comments.
Passion fades, but mercenaries are forever.
/*
"No one here is exactly what he appears."
G'Kar, Babylon 5
/*
References of interest:
/*
Technorati Profile
EventHorizon1984 Log
//
Posted at 17:48 in Business, Commentary, Weblogs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Tags: AuctionBytes, ChannelAdvisor, David Steiner, eBay Strategies, EcommerceBytes, proxy server, sock puppet
| Reblog (0)